RE: Location to host JBI components

I like the idea of a component repository and I think that whether a component should be in the SM code repository would be due to the following factors (not a complete list - just what comes to mind ;) : 1. Is the component likely to have a wide audience of users? 2. Is the component from a stand

Web server and distribution

In the current distribution, we currently ship ServiceMix as a standalone server, but we don't provide an easy way to deploy web applications. This would be very handy imho, so that we could maybe work more on the console web app (which is currently not very usable) and be able to deploy it easil

Location to host JBI components

I'd like to start a thread about where JBI components that are contributed by users should be hosted. I see several choices: * host them at ASF in the ServiceMix svn tree * host them somewhere else * do not host them * provide a nice catalog of available components like http://geronimoplu

[jira] Commented: (SM-693) DCOM component\Transport

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-693?page=comments#action_37154 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-693: If you need any advice on how to start your component, just ask questions on the mailing lists. > DCOM component\Transport

Re: Some bugs of Users' Guide

Yes, you are right ! Thanks for your answer. gnodet wrote: > > cp is for unix based system and copy is for windows. > If you have followed the previous steps, you should have > launched servicemix using the "bin/servicemix" command > from the root directory and the commands will work. > > It s

[jira] Commented: (SM-693) DCOM component\Transport

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-693?page=comments#action_37153 ] Vikram Roopchand commented on SM-693: - okay good...then I will start working on the transport. :), Thanks, best regards, Vikram > DCOM component\Transport > ---

[jira] Created: (SM-702) Components instantiated multiple times

Components instantiated multiple times -- Key: SM-702 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-702 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 3.0 Environment: Win32

[jira] Commented: (SM-693) DCOM component\Transport

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-693?page=comments#action_37151 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-693: Sure, that would be great ! > DCOM component\Transport > > > Key: SM-693 >

[jira] Commented: (SM-695) Dynamic HTTP provider endpoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-695?page=comments#action_37152 ] James Lorenzen commented on SM-695: --- Also, if you decide to incorporate this change once we get the patch, we would also most likely want to update the HTTP BC pag

[jira] Commented: (SM-695) Dynamic HTTP provider endpoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-695?page=comments#action_37150 ] James Lorenzen commented on SM-695: --- What do you suggest we call the property name? Meaning the property name the consumer sets in its NormalizedMessage to set the

Re: renaming servicemix-jsr181?

if we call it servicemix-cxf or servicemix-xfire - that still isn't very descriptive of what it does :) On 8 Oct 2006, at 16:44, James Strachan wrote: On 10/8/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I assume we would need to migrate to CXF instead of XFire. Yeah - I guess we could l

[jira] Commented: (SM-693) DCOM component\Transport

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-693?page=comments#action_37149 ] Vikram Roopchand commented on SM-693: - Hi, SourceForge permits more than one license to be attached to a project. Would it be acceptable if I release the bi

[jira] Commented: (SM-697) Using XSLT servicemix component causes a "java.io.IOException: Too many open files"

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-697?page=comments#action_37148 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-697: I have commited a fix. Could you test it ? Also, as I said on the mailing list, the new servicemix-saxon should not suffer f

[jira] Resolved: (SM-701) Standardized the return of exceptions from the AdminCommandsService, also extended the ANT tasks to provide a deferExceptions settings which if set to true allows you to use

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-701?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-701. Resolution: Fixed Author: gnodet Date: Tue Oct 10 08:08:40 2006 New Revision: 454773 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=454773 Log: SM-701: Standa

[jira] Created: (SM-701) Standardized the return of exceptions from the AdminCommandsService, also extended the ANT tasks to provide a deferExceptions settings which if set to true allows you to use t

Standardized the return of exceptions from the AdminCommandsService, also extended the ANT tasks to provide a deferExceptions settings which if set to true allows you to use the same semantics as the deploy/install directories. -

[jira] Updated: (SM-692) http endpoint activation ordering

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-692?page=all ] Fabrice Dewasmes updated SM-692: Attachment: patch_ordering2.txt here is a simpler patch using a LinkedHashMap instead of HashMap. Thanks to Guillaume for the hint. Fabrice > http endpoint

Some bugs of Users' Guide

Hello everybody ! I'm a new guy just join in WebserviceMix from China. I got some wrong information from Users' Guide. In "Deploy a sample application" of "Quick start", the exact command should be : copy components\servicemix-shared-*.zip bin\install copy components\servicemix-http-*.zip bin\inst