[jira] Created: (SM-985) Allow additional beans to be injected in the rules definition from the xbean.xml

Allow additional beans to be injected in the rules definition from the xbean.xml Key: SM-985 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-985 Project: ServiceMix

[jira] Resolved: (SM-985) Allow additional beans to be injected in the rules definition from the xbean.xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-985. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guillaume Nodet URL:

[jira] Commented: (SM-978) Provider side of the new HTTP endpoints

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39550 ] Thomas Termin commented on SM-978: -- How far is this? What is still to do? Provider side of the new HTTP endpoints

[jira] Commented: (SM-978) Provider side of the new HTTP endpoints

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39551 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-978: The work is based on jetty client which has not been released yet. And i'm not

[jira] Created: (SM-986) The maven jbi plugin should not fail it the SU jbi descriptor generation fails but only displays a warning

The maven jbi plugin should not fail it the SU jbi descriptor generation fails but only displays a warning -- Key: SM-986 URL:

[jira] Commented: (SM-983) Shared Library Updates Not Reflected In Installed Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39559 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-983: See for the discussion

Re: servicemix-sca: updating tuscany dependency

L.S., Just trying to grasp what the problem/question is... So, if I understand correctly, the servicemix-sca component will be somewhat different from any other JBI component. We won't be building an SCA container as a service engine (like you would do for e.g. EJBs), but rather build some

Re: servicemix-sca: updating tuscany dependency

I do think we need a SE like servicemix-sca (should be renamed to servicemix-tuscany i guess) to host the Java annotated SCA pojo. I see the translation between the SCA assembly to a JBI assembly as something somewhat independant from ServiceMix core that could be reused either at the tooling

Re: servicemix-sca: updating tuscany dependency

kitplummer (im)Agreed...and I believe based on my limited knowledge of Tuscany that updating the TuscanyRuntime to be able to deploy a SCA POJO should be straight forward - and simpler with the EmbeddedSCADomain. I also agree on the tooling to provide the mapping between an SCA Composite to

Re: servicemix-sca: updating tuscany dependency

[snip] Brian O'Neill wrote: OK, per Guillaume's suggestion perhaps we start anew basing everything on 0.90 sca. So, what are peoples thoughts towards the design of the translation layer? Should we leverage Tuscany's parsing capabilities to read in the SCA contribution? Then, from the parsed