On Aug 23, 2007, at 5:41 AM, Brian O'Neill wrote:
Fanastic. Once we get consensus on the direction (your first few
points), I wonder if we shouldn't break this email out to discuss the
specifics.
Yeah, good idea!
On 8/22/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I explained in the
On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
On Aug 23, 2007, at 5:41 AM, Brian O'Neill wrote:
Exchanges can be created using the Channel#createExchange method.
The only change I'd like to
integrate in the messaging API is to allow for non xml payloads and
maybe untyped
Btw, if there is sufficient interest, we could organize irc meetings
to discuss these topics and post the log to the dev list for archiving
and later discussion.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 22, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
As I explained in the other thread, I've been working on
I thought I'd spin up another thread on this...
On 8/23/07, Brian O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exchanges can be created using the Channel#createExchange method.
The only change I'd like to
integrate in the messaging API is to allow
Sure Guillaume.
Maybe the best thing to do is explain the concept...and what we've done to
meet our requirements.
It is actually quite simple. We needed to be able to connect two computers
together via TCP/IP, and have a publisher on one system, the consumer on the
other. Granted we've got
I'd be up for a few chat sessions!
On 8/23/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, if there is sufficient interest, we could organize irc meetings
to discuss these topics and post the log to the dev list for archiving
and later discussion.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 22,
On 8/23/07, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't looked at Camel converters, but would you consider adding a
contentType and contentEncoding mimicing the headers of HTTP SIP.
The endpoint can then use the type and encoding to determine how to
handle the content.
On 8/23/07, Daryl Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
[snip]
(anybody knows a good tool for uml ?).
Take a look at JUDE Community Edition. Works great for me.
http://jude.change-vision.com/jude-web/product/community.html
Looks like
On 8/23/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, Daryl Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
[snip]
(anybody knows a good tool for uml ?).
Take a look at JUDE Community Edition. Works great for me.
On 8/23/07, Kit Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used MagicDraw on OS X. It's pretty terrible...but does work for
sequence diagrams. I'm not sure if they have a free version or not.
Doesn't OmniGraffle do some UML stuff too?
Yeah I've used MagicDraw in the past. Unfortunately the free
Hi!
Sorry to drop in like this, but have you tried
http://argouml.tigris.org/ ?
Best regards,
Kovi
Dne 23.08.2007 (čet) ob 14:21 -0600 je Bruce Snyder zapisal(a):
On 8/23/07, Kit Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used MagicDraw on OS X. It's pretty terrible...but does work for
11 matches
Mail list logo
