Re: jms:endpoint role="consumer" versus jms:consumer

2007-05-09 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Yeah, the documentation has not been updated yet. The jms:consumer and jms:provider endpoints are quite new but they have much more options to configure them. I have made some load tests with them and it seems they work pretty well. On 5/7/07, Gert Vanthienen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: L.S.,

Re: jms:endpoint role="consumer" versus jms:consumer

2007-05-07 Thread Thomas TERMIN
Gert, I guess the latter. Look at SM-537. This is also available for http but not yet finished. Cheers, Thomas Gert Vanthienen wrote: > L.S., > > While I was trying to get automatic reconnect to a JMS broker (WebSphere > MQ which is restarted at least once per week) up and running with > , I no

jms:endpoint role="consumer" versus jms:consumer

2007-05-07 Thread Gert Vanthienen
L.S., While I was trying to get automatic reconnect to a JMS broker (WebSphere MQ which is restarted at least once per week) up and running with , I noticed the possibility of using to specify JMS message receiving into the ESB. The uses Spring's DefaultMessageListenerContainer class, whi