Re: [sfc-dev] [genius-dev] [netvirt-dev] Disable BFD monitoring for tunnels by default

2019-01-28 Thread Sam Hague
ot; Genius CSIT > jobs are failing. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Dimple. > > > > > > *From:* Vishal Thapar [mailto:vtha...@redhat.com] > *Sent:* Monday, January 28, 2019 7:12 AM > *To:* Sam Hague > *Cc:* Dimple Jain ; odl netvirt dev < >

Re: [sfc-dev] [netvirt-dev] Disable BFD monitoring for tunnels by default

2019-01-27 Thread Sam Hague
s from me, thanks. > > > Regards, > > > > *Brady Johnson* > > bjohn...@inocybe.ca > > > > [image: Image removed by sender.] > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:31 AM Faseela K wrote: > > Brady/David,

Re: [sfc-dev] Disable BFD monitoring for tunnels by default

2018-12-19 Thread Sam Hague
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Faseela K wrote: > Hi, > > > >There was a discussion in last genius weekly call, whether we can > disable tunnel monitoring by default. > > Vishal indicated that netvirt would prefer disabling monitoring by > default. > >And can be enabled explicitly if

Re: [sfc-dev] [controller-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] [release] Oxygen SR4 Status build 2018-12-06

2018-12-10 Thread Sam Hague
CSIT won't verify this, it is a change to UT code for an intermittent failure. If the build passes I think we are fine. On Mon, Dec 10, 2018, 4:38 AM Anil Belur > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:11 PM Aswin Suryanarayanan > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 9:00 PM Jamo Luhrsen wrote: >> >>> >

Re: [sfc-dev] [release] Autorelease oxygen failed to build odl-sfc-scf-openflow from sfc

2018-05-31 Thread Sam Hague
In this case, the sfc failure hit https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/ODLPARENT-144. That is the weird scr mbean issue that we can't seem to fix and hits us often through different projects. On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Robert Varga wrote: > On 31/05/18 22:05, Jamo Luhrsen wrote: > > this i

Re: [sfc-dev] Opendaylight support for networking-sfc

2018-05-29 Thread Sam Hague
feature you really need . This feature will pull in all the netvirt, openflowplugin, genius, neutron, etc features that are required. It will not pull in any dlux. > > > > > *Thanks* > > *Om Prakash* > > > > *From:* Sam Hague [mailto:sha...@redhat.com] > *Sent:* T

Re: [sfc-dev] Opendaylight support for networking-sfc

2018-05-29 Thread Sam Hague
1527615858 1110 fail > > 2018-05-29 18:02:50.105 | + ./stack.sh:exit_trap:533 : > [[ -z /opt/stack/logs ]] > > 2018-05-29 18:02:50.124 | + ./stack.sh:exit_trap:536 : > /opt/devstack/tools/worlddump.py -d /opt/stack/logs > > 2018-05-29 18:02:52

Re: [sfc-dev] [netvirt-dev] [WEATHER] TSC-114: Support OVS 2.9 NSH implementation, drop OVS 2.6 out-of-branch NSH support.

2018-05-28 Thread Sam Hague
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote: > Hello > > Heads up on this new proposed weather item, about supporting OVS 2.9 > NSH implementation breaking compatibility with the previous OVS 2.6 > out-of-branch NSH patch. > > Known affected projects are SFC, GBP and Netvirt. Anyone

Re: [sfc-dev] Opendaylight support for networking-sfc

2018-05-21 Thread Sam Hague
/stack.sh:exit_trap:536 : > /opt/devstack/tools/worlddump.py -d /opt/stack/logs > > 2018-05-21 22:03:37.863 | + ./stack.sh:exit_trap:545 : > exit 127 > > ~ > > > > Thanks > > Om Prakash > > > > -Original Mess

Re: [sfc-dev] Opendaylight support for networking-sfc

2018-05-19 Thread Sam Hague
networking-sfc is supported in ODL through NetVirt. I see you have been working with vpp which likely is using the gbp from odl and I don't think support was every added there. Either way, Manuel and Jaime are your experts and will know the right answers. On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 10:44 AM, PRAKASH,

Re: [sfc-dev] Migrating to OVS 2.9 with official NSH support

2018-04-19 Thread Sam Hague
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Brady Johnson wrote: > In the current Fluoring release, we (Jaime Camaaño) will be migrating the > ODL OpenFlow plugin to use OVS 2.9, where NSH is officially supported. > Currently ODL only supports NSH from OVS 2.6 + Yi Yang patch. > > We will be following a 2-s

Re: [sfc-dev] interest in discussing SFC topics at ONS?

2018-03-14 Thread Sam Hague
Adding Isaku for his thoughts on neutron content. Jaime, thanks for bringing this up. Yes this is a good topic to include. Currently there is a NetVirt session and a Neutron session for a total of two hours. I wonder if we can include the topic in these two sessions. Most likely in the neutron s

Re: [sfc-dev] CSIT verify job timing analysis

2018-01-08 Thread Sam Hague
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Brady Johnson wrote: > > Hello, > > Recently, we had problems with the ODL SFC CSIT verify jobs timing out > after 90 minutes. That was due mainly to problems with the testing > infrastructure when ODL migrated to a new cloud provider. In light of those > problems,

Re: [sfc-dev] [integration-dev] sfc csit failure

2017-12-22 Thread Sam Hague
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote: > Hello Jamo > > Took a quick look. > > The problem seems to be that the odl-sfc-openflow-renderer feature is > installed but the dependant bundles are not activated. This feature is > in charge of writing the flows, and the test fails be

Re: [sfc-dev] SFC jenkin jobs timing out

2017-12-15 Thread Sam Hague
sfc-provider? > Regards, > > Brady > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:18 AM Sam Hague wrote: > >> Do you need all the features being built? Stuff like vnfm could likely >> go. Seems like there are features tentatively included. Maybe collapse some >> featur

Re: [sfc-dev] SFC jenkin jobs timing out

2017-12-15 Thread Sam Hague
Do you need all the features being built? Stuff like vnfm could likely go. Seems like there are features tentatively included. Maybe collapse some features, like vpp into one. Remove the -rest features or collapse. Those are relics of the sample/archetype frameworks where there was an impl, rest an

Re: [sfc-dev] [opendaylight-dev] [netvirt-dev] [ODL][Nitrogen] Missing packages

2017-12-14 Thread Sam Hague
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Vishal Thapar wrote: > odl-netvirt-openstack replaces odl-ovsdb-openstack and odl-netvirt-sfc > replaces odl-ovsdb-sfc. You likely don't need odl-ovsdb-sfc-rest anymore. > Yes all you need for connectivity is just odl-netvirt-openstack and no other features. If

[sfc-dev] Request to acknowledge dependency on project

2017-11-01 Thread Sam Hague
Genius, SFC, please acknowledge that NetVirt has a dependency on your project. Thanks, Sam ___ sfc-dev mailing list sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev

Re: [sfc-dev] I think the SFC blueprint annotations is causing failures for NetVirt

2017-07-17 Thread Sam Hague
25 AM, Sam Hague wrote: > I removed the netvirt-sfc feature Friday since it was failing the sft so > this patch doesn't verify the issue is fixed. There were two patches that > did the remove, let me add that back and see if it verifies. > > On Jul 17, 2017 3:13 AM, "David

Re: [sfc-dev] I think the SFC blueprint annotations is causing failures for NetVirt

2017-07-17 Thread Sam Hague
; Best regards, > David. > > On vie, 2017-07-14 at 17:57 -0400, Sam Hague wrote: > > After the blueprint annotation patches started going in the SFT in NetVirt > fail on the building of the netvirt-sfc features. This is blocking merges > from finishing. > > Can someone take

Re: [sfc-dev] I think the SFC blueprint annotations is causing failures for NetVirt

2017-07-16 Thread Sam Hague
se a trivial patch on Netvirt to see if it is still > happening in Jenkins build. > > Best regards, > David. > > > On vie, 2017-07-14 at 17:57 -0400, Sam Hague wrote: > > After the blueprint annotation patches started going in the SFT in NetVirt > fail on the building of

[sfc-dev] I think the SFC blueprint annotations is causing failures for NetVirt

2017-07-14 Thread Sam Hague
After the blueprint annotation patches started going in the SFT in NetVirt fail on the building of the netvirt-sfc features. This is blocking merges from finishing. Can someone take a look if something is wrong with the blueprint patches? Thanks, Sam [1] https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/j

Re: [sfc-dev] Linux Bridge - ODL+Openstack integration

2017-03-02 Thread Sam Hague
Devendra, fyi, lithium and kilo are not supported anymore, but I don't think that is the issue. linux bridge is handled by openstack neutron agents, the l3 agent I think. I would check if that configuration is correct. Sam On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Devendra Singh Rawat < devendra_ra...@inf

Re: [sfc-dev] Ethernet+NSH encapsulation now implemented

2017-02-21 Thread Sam Hague
e > > -Original Message- > *From*: "Yang, Yi Y" <%22Yang,%20yi%20y%22%20%3cyi.y.y...@intel.com%3e>> > *To*: Sam Hague >, > Brady Allen Johnson > > *Cc*: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org <%22sfc-...@lists.opendaylight.org%22%20%3csfc-...@lists.opend

Re: [sfc-dev] Ethernet+NSH encapsulation now implemented

2017-02-20 Thread Sam Hague
Brady, does this still require an out-of-tree ovs version? Any idea how the work is going to get that upstreamed? Can we use the out-of-tree distro in the opnfv official tests or does that need to be an official ovs? Thanks, Sam On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Brady Allen Johnson < brady.alle

Re: [sfc-dev] [SFC] ODL SFC with single compute node and OVS 2.6.1 NSH patches

2017-02-08 Thread Sam Hague
controller, > SFC worked fine with x86 compute node. Then, I attached my aarch64 compute > node with OVS 2.6.1 patches (with DPDK), which is giving issues. > > Do I need to do anything different? > > > > Thanks for the help. > > > > Regards, > > Sr

Re: [sfc-dev] [SFC] ODL SFC with single compute node and OVS 2.6.1 NSH patches

2017-02-07 Thread Sam Hague
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Srikanth Lingala wrote: > Hi Brady, > > One small update. > > While creating SFC Classifier, in the karaf logs, I found the following > WARNING messages: > > > > 2017-02-06 20:48:47,977 | WARN | NV-SfcDTL-1 | > NetvirtSfcWorkaroundOF13Provider | 295 - > org

Re: [sfc-dev] [SFC] [SDNVPN] ETSI NFV Plugtest - Netvirt outcome

2017-02-02 Thread Sam Hague
Adding Aswin and Venkat. On Feb 2, 2017 4:37 AM, "Juan Manuel Fernandez" < juan.manuel.fernan...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Some of the people working for OPNFV in Madrid are involved in the ETSI > NFV Plugtest where interoperability among different MANO orchestrators, > NFVis and VNFs is

Re: [sfc-dev] [netvirt-dev] Bug in netvirt - sfc

2016-12-15 Thread Sam Hague
On Dec 15, 2016 1:49 AM, "Brady Allen Johnson" < brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com> wrote: Netvirt devs, Does Manuel's approach sound reasonable to the Netvirt community? As Manuel mentioned, the Netvirt SFC classifier rules are only populated on compute nodes where there is a service function (h

[sfc-dev] Expected dependency on project requested by NetVirt

2016-12-13 Thread Sam Hague
This email is to formally notify the following projects that NetVirt has a dependency on the project: Genius Neutron OVSDB SFC Please reply to this email acknowledging the dependency. Thanks, Sam ___ sfc-dev mailing list sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org

Re: [sfc-dev] Potential bug in NSH patch for OVS

2016-11-30 Thread Sam Hague
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:24 AM, László Sürü wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > Yes, and the default destination port for a VXLAN-GPE tunnel should be > 4790 then. > Does this matter yet? Meaning, is any of the gpe stuff really in use yet? Typically we just use the vxlan-gpe vtep as a standard vxlan vtep. T

Re: [sfc-dev] Weekly meeting agenda, Nov 23, 2016

2016-11-29 Thread Sam Hague
Brady, can we discuss the different chaining approaches tomorrow? Both non-nsh and nsh based? We are trying to align the netvirt and genius features. We would like to fit the requirements for the OPNFV releases. Also what meetings are there now? is there a single ODL/OPNFV SFC meeting? Could you

Re: [sfc-dev] [netvirt-dev] netvirt-SFC integration unconference ideas

2016-11-18 Thread Sam Hague
Couple comments : 1. The vxlan gpe tunnels. Today I don't think netvirt adds any of those. Sfc builds up everything on the sfc overlay. I think it just happened that the ingress nodes were also sff's so it worked out. Looks look we need to coordinate now. 2. The egress from sfc. As Brady mentio

Re: [sfc-dev] [release] distribution check failing on netvirt master

2016-11-04 Thread Sam Hague
The sfc bump patch is making its way through the downstream consumers. Just need the other projects to merge. On Nov 4, 2016 6:08 AM, "Stephen Kitt" wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:58:22 + > Vishal Thapar wrote: > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/netvirt- > distribution-check-ca

Re: [sfc-dev] [release] Netvirt Blocker bug: Problems with the netvirt classifier in SFC

2016-10-26 Thread Sam Hague
I reassigned this bug back to sfc. netvirt can't do anything without an RSP and netvirt does not create RSP's either. That needs to be debugged why the RSP isn't there - either wrong name given or simply doesn't exist at the time the acl is requested. Full logs with trace enabled for sfc and netvi

Re: [sfc-dev] [netvirt-dev] Networking SFC convertor in ODL

2016-10-04 Thread Sam Hague
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > Hi Brady, > > Please see inline.. > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Brady Johnson < > bradyallenjohn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Anil, >> >> We're talking about 2 different patches here. >> >> I remember patch [0] well, and the discussions

Re: [sfc-dev] [release] Merge a large Openflow plugin patch to master and stable/boron today

2016-08-11 Thread Sam Hague
The verify job was failing because of a couple test in sfc failing. I pushed [1] to comment out the two failing tests. That isn't the right fix but it should let the job verify if those were the only two problems. Once that gets in can we get the other patches in that should go with the openflow c

[sfc-dev] build failed: could not find sfc-vpp-renderer

2016-08-04 Thread Sam Hague
Hey guys, netvirt builds are failing on the vpp stuff. Is this because [1] is failing to merge? Or related to the openflowplugin patch? Thanks, Sam [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42699/ [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project openstack.net-virt-sfc-features: Could not resolve dep