From: levin li
Since we already send vdi copy list in get_vdis(), there's no
need to send the vdi_inuse bitmap any more, without it we can
send less data as the length of vdi copy list is variable and
it contains the vid just as vdi_inuse does.
Signed-off-by: levin li
---
sheep/group.c |
At Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:56:35 +0800,
levin li wrote:
>
> From: levin li
>
> Since we already send vdi copy list in get_vdis(), there's no
> need to send the vdi_inuse bitmap any more, without it we can
> send less data as the length of vdi copy list is variable and
> it contains the vid just as v
At Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:38:43 +0900,
MORITA Kazutaka wrote:
>
> At Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:56:35 +0800,
> levin li wrote:
> >
> > From: levin li
> >
> > Since we already send vdi copy list in get_vdis(), there's no
> > need to send the vdi_inuse bitmap any more, without it we can
> > send less data
On 2012年08月24日 12:38, MORITA Kazutaka wrote:
> At Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:56:35 +0800,
> levin li wrote:
>>
>> From: levin li
>>
>> Since we already send vdi copy list in get_vdis(), there's no
>> need to send the vdi_inuse bitmap any more, without it we can
>> send less data as the length of vdi copy
At Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:10:53 +0800,
levin li wrote:
>
> Well, I didn't notice that, I'd like to update this patch to add a new
> local operation for sheep and collie to read the vdi list rather than
> using SD_OP_READ_VDIS, the bitmap is not so small, as I calculated the
> size of vdi_inuse is 2M,