Re: Hover/leave

Multiple windows are done using the 'window' command, which works the same as Shoes.app, same args, take a block, all that jazz. The only difference is that the window will have it's 'parent' property set to the Shoes.app which created it. You can then close a window with somewindow.close I

Re: A nodebox tribute

Emanuel Carnevale wrote: well, calling it a tribute it's too much... this evening I've tinkered a little with shoes and I came out with a nodebox like app. Oo I just thought of a way to use the Copy button I proposed for help.rb. Add a button to the bottom of your nodebox that raises the manu

Re: Hover/leave

This works for me: Shoes.app do mystack = stack :width => 50, :height => 50 do background red hover do mystack.clear {background blue} end leave do mystack.clear {background red} end end end Is this what you wanted to do? The only thing I changed was putting th

Hover/leave

So, I was looking at the slots/mouse functions of the shoes Manual (Slots > Events) I entered in the first example perfectly, since I want to mess around with leave/hover. My code is thus: Shoes.app do stack :width => 50, :height => 50 do background red hover do clear {backgroun

A nodebox tribute

well, calling it a tribute it's too much... this evening I've tinkered a little with shoes and I came out with a nodebox like app. on the left you write shoes code and it can appear on the right. useful to try the elements and their properties I thought..or maybe to teach some shoes. anyway, the c

Re: Rather smashing dialog

Bluebie, Jenna wrote: Could we get doc's on what the thing is that gets passed to animate blocks? is it just an integer that goes up by one on each calling? Cosmetic animation may use such an integer, but simulations should always work off the clock. This is a fundamental principle of videoga

Re: Rather smashing dialog

Maybe shoes day 2 then! ^_^ Long as it works in the release, i'll be mighty happy. This gem thing sure is nifty! and Pulsatey too! Could we get doc's on what the thing is that gets passed to animate blocks? is it just an integer that goes up by one on each calling?

Re: Rather smashing dialog

On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 03:19:29PM +1000, Bluebie, Jenna wrote: > Oh, leopard has some compiling problems, hackety.org says. Huh. Still? > Dang. Be good if those got fixed before shoes day. yeah, the problem is v-fishy and due to varying versions between gcc and the shared libs i am distributing.

My shoes tutorial

I have written a tiny article for beginners to learn the very basics of shoes. Its available on my blog. Plz comment and if you find it useful pass it around plz.

Re: relative loading annoys terminal users

i used to get such errors back on the curious 3 but that was for the image files in static. On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Bluebie, Jenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, well someone was having an issue, they had installed shoes in to.. > /opt or something, and shoes would report that it could

Re: Rather smashing dialog

Not to worry for now, I found the json_pure gem, which only includes pure ruby code. :) Still, _why, would be really nice to have this functional for shoes day.

Re: Rather smashing dialog

I hit send too soon. In OS X, there's another environment variable, DYN_LOAD_LIBRARY (?) or something like that On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 01:24 -0600, Cecil Coupe wrote: > Wouldn't you have to put the native shared library (.so, .dylib, > what-ev) in a shoes accessible libload path? Its the back door

Re: Rather smashing dialog

Wouldn't you have to put the native shared library (.so, .dylib, what-ev) in a shoes accessible libload path? Its the back door to madness IMO, totally non portable, but sometimes setting the environment LD_LIBRARY_PATH properly won't screw up everything else on your system as well. Once bitten (So