Hi Harry,
Thanks for the congrats... just to clarify though, it was only the
public players championship, pretty small potatoes compared to something
like an Ontario Amateur title... don't want people to get the wrong
idea! : ) (The tournament field was only about 30 people but I was
pretty
The Paul's still have a major financial interest
in Golfsmith, would anyone really expect them to
say anything different? Just a nice spin to
attempt to maintain the customer base. MO
Carl
--- Bruce Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like they may be around for a while. I
would hate to see
Help! I want to make up a set of cu/be irons. I can't seem to find a
supplier. Anyone have any suggestions?
Tom
Hi Mark,
I haven't seen the app. yet so this is new to me and it is a definite
change from years past. Of course, if I understand what you have said, you
could list Golfsmith, Golfworks, and Dynacraft as references and be
ok. See what happens when you miss the Shoptalk Umbrella Open 2 years
So you coming this year? We hope so. Don't you have some official duties
to do for the PCS booth there?
Mark
Al Taylor wrote:
Hi Mark-
I'm looking forward to seeing you all again this year - you too Al- and I
hope Jen and RK can make it also! I looked at the web site a few days ago
and was also confused. They list an FCS for an affiliation. Do you think
it's a typo? What about buyers who work with/for you, but you do
Good Evening Mr. Patton,
The new 'rules' for PGA attendance may be a way to weed out people who
shouldn't be going to the show. In my opinion, with all the talk of how the
Show may be downsizing, it may be a bit of a mistake.
Having said that, I registered, gave 3 references (none of
I am not sure yet if I am going to be able to go or not... but the 3
references thing might just weed me out, since technically speaking I
closed my clubmaking business (which wasn't much of a business to start
with anyway but it got me in to the show at least).
We'll see... last year I came
Hi Lloyd
If you are going to throw out the statistic on Shaft Lab = 50% fitting
success,
then I would be curious as to: FitChip = XX% fitting success
BTW, what is wrong in building demo's and field testing these on the golf
range.
Wouldn't that be a better strategy to either
