r 28, 2006 2:28
PMTo: ShopTalk@mail.msen.comSubject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft
behaviour
Hey T
Flan and all,
Lloyd never
ever never ever gives up. No matter what. LOL :-).
I luv
you guys,
~~myKey~~, Mike
Phelan
aight with these test clubs, but low and shorter by about 15 yards
per iron and 30+ with the driver.
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dave Tutelman
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 10:39 PM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: Re: ShopT
In a message dated 10/29/2006 6:22:48 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Look at my review. Way back when I first wrote it, I began it with:
"...I was pumped by the idea of such a small and [potentially]
inexpensive device giving lots of useful shaft fitting data. From an
engi
nal Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 2:28 PMTo: ShopTalk@mail.msen.comSubject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft behaviour Hey T Flan and all, Lloyd never ever never ever gives up. No matter what. LOL :-).I luv you guys,~~myKey~~, Mike Phelan
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft
behaviour
Hey T
Flan and all,
Lloyd
never ever never ever gives up. No matter what. LOL :-).
I luv
you guys,
~~myKey~~,
Mike Phelan
At 01:41 AM 10/29/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies to those who don't want to hear it...
David,
I've heard it before. From you. In person. Watching your guys fit
people. Doesn't bother me, because...
First let me say it is a fitting tool that gives you data, the same
as a lie boa
In a message dated 10/28/2006 5:22:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subj: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft behaviour
Date: 10/28/2006 5:22:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Sent from the Internet
Well
Hey Professor;
Indeed, coulda been you. What really cracks me up is that if I had
followed the recommendations provided by the (you know what) I'd likely
be in traction today, rather than undergoing epidurals (six so far, with
six more scheduled for Thursday next). The good news is that they s
At 08:22 PM 10/28/2006, tflan wrote:
...I don't recall anyone on these here pages who was tested with
LHack's device other than one guy (who I don't recall). What I do
recall is that the tested one wasn't happy at all with the results.
Could have been me. The shoe fits. The recommendation was
Okay, ohhky. I get the firmness of the reply ;-)
TFlan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/28/06 8:22:52 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm wondering then, theorists aside, has anyone ever actually
tried the FitChip?
I trie
In a message dated 10/28/06 8:22:52 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm
wondering then, theorists aside, has anyone ever actually tried the
FitChip?
I tried the FitChip twice and have the children to
prove it. I just chalked it up to experience and call the result
so I'd like to
hear some empirical comments from you guys.
TFlan
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 12:57
PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft
behaviour
Darn! It's going to be a Lng
Winter!
n the hands (not even a spring
force because flesh is not a spring) until the shaft passes through
straight.
llhack
> [Original Message]
> From: Alan Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 10/28/2006 6:39:50 PM
> Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft behaviour
>
> At 03:5
straight.
llhack
> [Original Message]
> From: Alan Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 10/28/2006 6:39:50 PM
> Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft behaviour
>
> At 03:51 PM 10/28/2006 -0400, you wrote:
> > It is also not a 'free' beam
> > >
At 03:51 PM 10/28/2006 -0400, you wrote:
It is also not a 'free' beam
> end, but I think a better model would be a 'hinged' connection to the
mass
> of the hands.
***It would be difficult to justify a hinge since the shaft is held in the
hands over 5 to 7 inches of length and the wrists are no
Darn! It's going to be a Lng Winter!
Repeat after me LLHACK is right!
Repeat after me LLHACK is right!
Repeat after me LLHACK is right!
Repeat after me LLHACK is right!
Repeat after me LLHACK is right!
Repeat after me LLHACK is right!
Repeat after me LLHACK is right!
Repea
*** Response below
> [Original Message]
> From: Alan Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 10/27/2006 10:13:53 PM
> Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft behaviour
>
> Sorry, Lloyd, this mechanical engineer doesn't buy it. The hands are far
> to soft to produce a c
Hey T Flan and all,
Lloyd never ever never ever gives up. No matter what. LOL :-).
I luv you guys,
~~myKey~~, Mike Phelan
Apparently it will go on until "dose" becomes
"does".
TFlan
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 4:50
PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft
behaviour
Please tell me I&#
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE dont anyone respond to this topic!
You are correct Arnie we have beaten this to death more than once.
From: "Lloyd Hackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/10/27 Fri PM 07:32:17 EST
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft behaviour
A
changed his mind and agreed
with me.
llhack
> [Original Message]
> From: Alan Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 10/26/2006 10:41:14 PM
> Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft behaviour
>
> I read through Dave Tutelman's comments on the shaft behavior model that
> FitChip i
Please tell me I'm not loosing my mind!
Wasn't the Fit Chip subject beaten to death before?
>
> To:
> Date: 10/26/2006 10:41:14 PM
> Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft behaviour
>
> I read through Dave Tutelman's comments on the shaft behavior model that
> FitChip is relying on and I agree with him that their model is wrong.
You
> can't treat a golf cl
I read through Dave Tutelman's comments on the shaft behavior model that
FitChip is relying on and I agree with him that their model is wrong. You
can't treat a golf club swung by the hands the same as a club clamped in a
vise. The vibration mode is not the same. First, the hands are far too
At 07:28 AM 10/26/2006, André Cantin wrote:
Tom. Please take a look at the following link:
http://www.fitchip.com/fitchip4club.htm
I always believed that the shaft reacted just
the opposite from the pics above the graph. Your take please.
I'm not Tom, but I agree pretty much with Tom's
take
06 4:29 AM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: ShopTalk: Shaft behaviour
Tom. Please take a look at the following link:
http://www.fitchip.com/fitchip4club.htm
I always believed that the shaft reacted just the opposite from the pics
above the graph. Your take please.
André.
-
Tom. Please take a look at the following link:
http://www.fitchip.com/fitchip4club.htm
I always believed that the shaft reacted just the opposite from the pics
above the graph. Your take please.
André.
-
27 matches
Mail list logo
