On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Whiteside wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Basically, my layout is as follows.
> >
> > I have a ADSL Modem with DHCP assigned, I use my own DNS servers, and
> > currently eth0 is attached to the modem. Then eth1 is attached to
Resent with corrected Subject
Problems Corrected in Shorewall-shell 4.0.14.
1) If 'all-' appears in the DEST column of /etc/shorewall/rules and
the SOURCE column is not some form of 'all', then $FW was
incorrectly included in the DEST.
Problems Corrected in Shorewall-common and Shorewal
Hi,
I am running Shorewall shell version 4.0.12 on my CentOS installation.It was
installed using "yum" ; however it is pretty old version and I want to
upgrade it to the latest version.
Unfortunately when I search the repositories with "yum search shorewall" I
can't find anything newer than 4.0.12
Martin Leben wrote:
> mess-mate wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've a setup as follows (runs marvelous) :
>>
>> modem (ppp0)
>>
>> 1st machine = proxy/router/shorewall (eth0, eth1, eth2)
>>
>> 2d machine = dmz http-server/lan mail-server (eth0)
>>
>> switch ->lan machines
>>
>>
>> to save energie and n
Alex Whiteside wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Basically, my layout is as follows.
>
> I have a ADSL Modem with DHCP assigned, I use my own DNS servers, and
> currently eth0 is attached to the modem. Then eth1 is attached to my
> local network.
>
> I used the two-interface setup and it worked great, but now
Hello,
Basically, my layout is as follows.
I have a ADSL Modem with DHCP assigned, I use my own DNS servers, and
currently eth0 is attached to the modem. Then eth1 is attached to my local
network.
I used the two-interface setup and it worked great, but now I have decided
to DMZ my vunerable serv
--- On Thu, 9/25/08, Chuck Kollars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tool that can identify port
> 443 connections that don't use W3C-sanctioned encryption
> handshake methods
That could be interesting.
Thank you and the rest of the ML users for the feedback.
Vieri
--
