Asim Ahmed Khan wrote:
> hi,
>
> First i tried to run squid as transparent (interception) proxy that
> didn't work. Browsing and other internet usage became too
> inconsisten. too many break ups were occuring and all of a sudden
> browsing stop and restart after some time ranging from a 30 seco
hi,
First i tried to run squid as transparent (interception) proxy that didn't
work. Browsing and other internet usage became too inconsisten. too many
break ups were occuring and all of a sudden browsing stop and restart after
some time ranging from a 30 seconds to a few minutes. hitting F5 keys
Do you have an example of the needed tcrules and yes all 3 links go to the same
ISP
you can find wanitor in this address ..
http://www.aitelecom.net/wanitor/
you can test it and if you think its ok we can link it from the page
Fernando Rodriguez
f...@aitelecom.net
On Dec 15, 2009, at 12
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> Kernel 2.6.22.19
This can happen when multiple connections exist to the same server; they
can go through different routes. The SAME marking target in
/etc/shorewall/tcrules is designed to get around that issue.
>
> Wanitor is similar to LSM with the exeption that if y
Kernel 2.6.22.19
Wanitor is similar to LSM with the exeption that if you have multiple isp it
will not monitor the gateway only but it will also make a route to the internet
to scecified ip tru the interface you are testing because we have noticed that
your initial gw might be alive but there i
Peter Wrangell wrote:
> My apologies, for taking up your time. I'll try again running the
> latest version. I was just confused as to why the params file was not
> being parsed as a collection of variables. Given enough time I'll
> figure it out. Thanks for responding so quickly, and once again sor
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a multi ISP setup with 3 providers, but there is something
> funny happening with only 1 of the 3 providers i have no issues at
> all with 2 or the 3 providers i start having issues regarding
> connections they seem to jump from one to the other for ex
Hello,
I have a multi ISP setup with 3 providers, but there is something funny
happening with only 1 of the 3 providers i have no issues at all
with 2 or the 3 providers i start having issues regarding connections they seem
to jump from one to the other for example:
with skype i get cutoff duri
Thanks Tom. I'll go over my configuration a few more times.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Tildar wrote:
>> I am attempting to use the Knock.pm from
>> http://www.shorewall.net/ManualChains.html
>>
>> I am not having much luck making the DNAT- knock work for some reason.
>>
Tom Eastep wrote:
> Stephen Brown wrote:
>> I'm using 4.4.0, so that would make RFC1918_STRICT deprecated?
>>
>> I'm just a little confused now on the network settings for the port that
>> is attached to the DSL modem, it's on eth0.
>>
>> I currently have this setup in /etc/network/interfaces (I'm
Stephen Brown wrote:
> I'm using 4.4.0, so that would make RFC1918_STRICT deprecated?
>
> I'm just a little confused now on the network settings for the port that
> is attached to the DSL modem, it's on eth0.
>
> I currently have this setup in /etc/network/interfaces (I'm running
> Debian 5.0 "Le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm using 4.4.0, so that would make RFC1918_STRICT deprecated?
I'm just a little confused now on the network settings for the port that
is attached to the DSL modem, it's on eth0.
I currently have this setup in /etc/network/interfaces (I'm running
De
Stephen Brown wrote:
>> I didn't even add a static route. I've a similar setup (Netgear
>> DM111P) and the only thing I've had to do is add a rule to allow the
>> traffic to that IP address (otherwise it gets blocked by all the
>> RFC1918 rules). The modem knows that to reach my public IP it has to
I wrote:
>They could probably be narrowed down to :
># RFC1918
>ACCEPT net:192.168.x.1 $FW udp 67-68
>HTTP(ACCEPT)loc net:192.168.x.1
>Telnet(ACCEPT) loc net:192.168.x.1
>Ping(ACCEPT)loc net:192.16
Stephen Brown wrote:
> > I didn't even add a static route. I've a similar setup (Netgear
>> DM111P) and the only thing I've had to do is add a rule to allow the
>> traffic to that IP address (otherwise it gets blocked by all the
>> RFC1918 rules). The modem knows that to reach my public IP it
15 matches
Mail list logo
