Am 01.01.2013 03:18, schrieb tony.blue.mailingl...@gmx.de:
> Am 31.12.2012 20:39, schrieb Tom Eastep:
>
With the above Konfigruation I can reach everything in the local network
(for example, pick up mail, surf the DMZ) but I can not surf the
Internet. The requests are sent, in the syslog is also
Am 31.12.2012 20:39, schrieb Tom Eastep:
> > /etc/shorewall/hosts
> #ZONE HOSTS OPTIONS
> vpn1 eth0:0.0.0.0/0
> That can't be right -- don't you want ppp0:0.0.0.0/0?
>
Thank you for this great tip. Now l2tp/ipec gets a connect.
>> > /etc/shorewal
On 12/31/12 10:37 AM, tony.blue.mailingl...@gmx.de wrote:
> I configured shorewall like the instructiones in
> http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html but it does not run.
>
> I allways get in /var/log/syslog:
> ...
> Dec 31 19:08:31 router kernel: [81080.616087]
> Shorewall:INPUT:REJECT:IN=ppp
Hello Mailinglist,
I'm stumped. For three days I tried unsuccessfully to get started with
L2TP/IPSEC with shorewall.
I configured shorewall like the instructiones in
http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html but it does not run.
I allways get in /var/log/syslog:
...
Dec 31 19:08:31 router kernel
On 12/31/2012 09:17 AM, Simon Hobson wrote:
> Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>> In this setup, I would simply set the 'proxyarp' option on all
>> interfaces and not worry about entries in /etc/shorewall/proxyarp.
>
> I have one question here. I use routing entries to direct traffic for
> specific IP addres
Tom Eastep wrote:
>In this setup, I would simply set the 'proxyarp' option on all
>interfaces and not worry about entries in /etc/shorewall/proxyarp.
I have one question here. I use routing entries to direct traffic for specific
IP addresses to the right VLAN, and proxy-arp takes care of the res
On 12/31/2012 04:10 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
> Hi Tom and all,
>
> I've just updated a box to 4.5.11.1 and it won't start with
> Loading Modules...
>ERROR: Invalid modules file entry /usr/share/shorewall/modules.xtables
> (line 45)
> from /usr/share/shorewall/modules (line 23)
>
> Looks
On 12/31/2012 05:44 AM, Simon Hobson wrote:
> "Simon Matter" wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I understood exactly but is it so that you'll have one VLAN
>> interface per client on the box? If so then I think ISC DHCP will work as
>> long as you make it listening on all those interfaces. It will complain
"Simon Matter" wrote:
>I'm not sure I understood exactly but is it so that you'll have one VLAN
>interface per client on the box? If so then I think ISC DHCP will work as
>long as you make it listening on all those interfaces. It will complain
>about it with "Multiple interfaces match the same bla
Hi Tom and all,
I've just updated a box to 4.5.11.1 and it won't start with
Loading Modules...
ERROR: Invalid modules file entry /usr/share/shorewall/modules.xtables
(line 45)
from /usr/share/shorewall/modules (line 23)
Looks like this patch is wrong
--- shorewall-4.5.11/modules.xtables
> I've got a project coming up that requires me to protect hosts from each
> other within a network. Specifically, we've a class C subnet, and some
> addresses are assigned to customers (only a handful) we resell bandwidth
> to. At present they are just plugged into our frontend network - not as
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
