Re: [Shorewall-users] new vif on bridge after restarting vm

2014-02-06 Thread Jan Hoersch
On 02/06/2014 01:33 PM, Simon Hobson wrote: > Jan Hoersch wrote: > >> Sorry for the misconception, but we are not using the vif name in our rules. >> There's one host configured with the ip adresses. (see /etc/shorewall/hosts) >> The rules are using: domu: to firewall individual guests >> ACCEPT

Re: [Shorewall-users] new vif on bridge after restarting vm

2014-02-06 Thread Simon Hobson
Jan Hoersch wrote: > Sorry for the misconception, but we are not using the vif name in our rules. > There's one host configured with the ip adresses. (see /etc/shorewall/hosts) > The rules are using: domu: to firewall individual guests > ACCEPT all domu:10.1.2.153 tcp

Re: [Shorewall-users] new vif on bridge after restarting vm

2014-02-06 Thread Jan Hoersch
Sorry for the misconception, but we are not using the vif name in our rules. There's one host configured with the ip adresses. (see /etc/shorewall/hosts) /etc/shorewall/hosts domuxenbr0:10.1.2.153,10.1.2.36, routeback The rules are using: domu: to firewall individual guests ACCEPT al

Re: [Shorewall-users] Package for collection only ?

2014-02-06 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:40:21AM +, Simon Hobson wrote: > > As a side effect, a couple of the machine I would like to add it to > are running older versions (as far back as Lenny). I assume I might > stand a slight chance of manually installing later packages if there > were less dependencie

Re: [Shorewall-users] new vif on bridge after restarting vm

2014-02-06 Thread Simon Hobson
Jan Hoersch wrote: > During restart of the VM the vif gets removed and newly assigned to the > bridge. It seems something changed in enumerating the vif and the > iptable rules don't match up with the new vif. Yes, that's normal. The VM index increments each time a VM is started - the first wil

Re: [Shorewall-users] Package for collection only ?

2014-02-06 Thread Simon Hobson
Sassy Natan wrote: > Not sure I understand what you mean here. > What you are trying to achieve? Not surprising, first "oops" of the day - sending to wrong list ! Was meant for the RRD users list. -- Managing the Perf

Re: [Shorewall-users] Package for collection only ?

2014-02-06 Thread Sassy Natan
Hi, Not sure I understand what you mean here. What you are trying to achieve? Sassy On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Simon Hobson wrote: > Just lately I've been configuring some data collection on a number of > machines (all Debian). All of these scripts do nothing more than "collect > some

[Shorewall-users] Package for collection only ?

2014-02-06 Thread Simon Hobson
Just lately I've been configuring some data collection on a number of machines (all Debian). All of these scripts do nothing more than "collect some data, use rrdtool ... --daemon ..." to send it to a central point where it's stored and graphed. None of these remote machines do any storage or gr