On 11/08/2015 07:53 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 11/8/2015 6:20 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
>> Building v5x using the newly available 'build50' script, the tarball
>> Building target platforms: noarch-linux
>> Building for target noarch-linux
>>
>> Step "do_rpmbuild -
On 11/09/2015 07:24 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
> I realized this morning that this is most likely due to missing 5.0.1
> tracking branches. In that case, the build will use the 'master' branch
> which is 5.0.2-RC1.
>
> In both the 'release' and 'trunk' repositories, you will need to create
> a 5.0.
On 11/09/2015 08:29 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 07:24 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>>
>> I realized this morning that this is most likely due to missing 5.0.1
>> tracking branches. In that case, the build will use the 'master' branch
>> which is 5.0.2-RC1.
>>
>> In both the 'release' and 'trun
On 11/9/2015 3:33 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 08:29 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>> On 11/09/2015 07:24 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I realized this morning that this is most likely due to missing 5.0.1
>>> tracking branches. In that case, the build will use the 'master' branch
>>> which is 5
> I don't see how this can be a defect in build50:
>
> teastep@gateway:~/shorewall/tools/build$ fgrep rpmbuild build50
> do_rpmbuild() {
> RPM=yes rpmbuild --target noarch-linux $@ >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
> do_or_die do_rpmbuild "-ba $RPMDIR/SPECS/${2}.spec"
> teastep@gateway:~/shorewall/tools
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:20:46 -0800
PGNet Dev wrote:
> > I don't see how this can be a defect in build50:
> >
> > teastep@gateway:~/shorewall/tools/build$ fgrep rpmbuild build50
> > do_rpmbuild() {
> > RPM=yes rpmbuild --target noarch-linux $@ >> $LOGFILE 2>&1
> > do_or_die do_rpmbuild
