Re: [Shorewall-users] Re (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread Bruce Bannerman
I’ve been using Shorewall under Debian for quite a while without to much trouble. I assume that you have seen the Debian packaging rationale for Shorewall in the docs directory, together with the example files for several configurations. From memory, these are in /usr/share/docs/shorewall And

[Shorewall-users] Re (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread peter
From: Justin Pryzby Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 22:15:51 -0600 > What do you mean "the installed snat file" ? When shorewall is installed in Debian 10, files /etc/shorewall/interfaces, /etc/shorewall/snat and others are installed. They are skeletal and need adaptation. > Was it installed in

Re: [Shorewall-users] Re (2): (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread Matt Darfeuille
On 11/30/2020 5:15 AM, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 07:41:57PM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: >> From:Justin Pryzby >> Date:Sun, 29 Nov 2020 19:20:04 -0600 >>> ... variable called NET_IF but then referred to it without a dollar sign, >>> ... >> >> NET_IF

Re: [Shorewall-users] Re (2): (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 07:41:57PM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > From: Justin Pryzby > Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 19:20:04 -0600 > > ... variable called NET_IF but then referred to it without a dollar sign, > > ... > > NET_IF appears in the 2nd column of the installed interfaces file and > in

[Shorewall-users] Re (2): (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread peter
From: Justin Pryzby Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 19:20:04 -0600 > ... variable called NET_IF but then referred to it without a dollar sign, ... NET_IF appears in the 2nd column of the installed interfaces file and in the 3rd column of the installed snat file. These came from the Debian package

Re: [Shorewall-users] (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 03:55:55PM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > From: Justin Pryzby > > I guess it should be while shorewall is running. > > Sorry. Try now. > http://easthope.ca/shorewall.dump.txt I'm not in the habit of reading shorewall dumps, but it seems like you used a variable

[Shorewall-users] (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread peter
From: Justin Pryzby > I guess it should be while shorewall is running. Sorry. Try now. http://easthope.ca/shorewall.dump.txt ... P. -- Tel: +1 604 670 0140Bcc: peter at easthope. ca ___ Shorewall-users

[Shorewall-users] Re (2): (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread peter
One additional detail. These two lines are included in the report when the WiFi connection is opened. send_packet: No buffer space available dhclient.c:2445: Failed to send 300 byte long packet over wlxa0f3c10a28f7 interface. Aside from the problem with shorewall, WiFi works. Thanks,

Re: [Shorewall-users] (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 03:29:21PM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > Would you send your entire config or preferably a shorweall dump ? > > Click here . > http://easthope.ca/shorewall.dump.txt I guess it should be while shorewall is running. -- Justin

Re: [Shorewall-users] (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread peter
From: Justin Pryzby Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 13:42:31 -0600 > How did you run echo $FW ? Before running shorewall, open a terminal. Type echo $FW Type shorewall start ...report from shorewall ... Type echo $FW That's all. FW is empty or undefined. > Would you send your entire config or

Re: [Shorewall-users] (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:13:58AM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Those status reports are semantically inconsistent with "not a > daemon". Status reports such as "Shorewll has configured Netfilter" > and "Shorewall has cleared its configuration of Netfilter" would be > better. > > (2) The

[Shorewall-users] (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

2020-11-29 Thread peter
(1) https://shorewall.org/Introduction.html has the sentence "Shorewall is not a daemon." "shorewall status" reports "Shorewall is running" or "Shorewall is stopped". Those status reports are semantically inconsistent with "not a daemon". Status reports such as "Shorewll has configured