Re: [Shorewall-users] Re (n): (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

On 11/30/2020 6:43 PM, Tuomo Soini wrote: > On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:51:00 -0800 > pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > >>> Unless 'physical' is set in the third column of the interfaces file, >>> which is what we do in the provided samples (1). >>> ... >>> 1) >>>

Re: [Shorewall-users] Re (n): (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:51:00 -0800 pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > Unless 'physical' is set in the third column of the interfaces file, > > which is what we do in the provided samples (1). > > ... > > 1) > > https://gitlab.com/shorewall/code/-/raw/master/Shorewall/Samples/one-interface/interfaces >

[Shorewall-users] Re (n): (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

> Unless 'physical' is set in the third column of the interfaces file, > which is what we do in the provided samples (1). > ... > 1) > https://gitlab.com/shorewall/code/-/raw/master/Shorewall/Samples/one-interface/interfaces OK, thanks. I've always relied on https://shorewall.org/ as the

[Shorewall-users] Re (2): Re (1)"shorewall status" and (2)$FW.

Hello Bruce, Thanks for your reply. From: Bruce Bannerman Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:26:04 +1100 > I’ve been using Shorewall under Debian for quite a while without to > much trouble. Yes, Shorewall has been working here for more than five years. Recently two factors have introduced a