Hello,
I trying to setup multi-isp configuration (using latest bering-uClibc
3.1-beta1), and began reading the corresponding doc:
http://www.shorewall.net/3.0/MultiISP.html
I am not clear on how the DNS resolution happens if a DNS request
from one provider goes to the other provider's
> > I trying to setup multi-isp configuration (using latest bering-uClibc
> > 3.1-beta1), and began reading the corresponding doc:
> > http://www.shorewall.net/3.0/MultiISP.html
> > I am not clear on how the DNS resolution happens if a DNS request
> > from one provider goes to the other
> >>> I trying to setup multi-isp configuration (using latest bering-uClibc
> >>> 3.1-beta1), and began reading the corresponding doc:
> >>> http://www.shorewall.net/3.0/MultiISP.html
> >>> I am not clear on how the DNS resolution happens if a DNS request
> >>> from one provider goes to
> > I trying to setup multi-isp configuration (using latest bering-uClibc
> > 3.1-beta1), and began reading the corresponding doc:
> > http://www.shorewall.net/3.0/MultiISP.html
> > I am not clear on how the DNS resolution happens if a DNS request
> > from one provid
Quoting Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In a scenario like this, I would just run bind on one of the local
> servers and let it do lookups from the DNS root, ignoring the ISPs
> forwarders completely. There's no rule that you have to use them,
> they're mostly for the desktop users who can'
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I trying to setup multi-isp configuration (using latest bering-uClibc
> > 3.1-beta1), and began reading the corresponding doc:
> > http://www.shorewall.net/3.0/MultiISP.html
> > I am not clear on how the DNS reso
> > I trying to setup multi-isp configuration (using latest bering-uClibc
> > 3.1-beta1), and began reading the corresponding doc:
> > http://www.shorewall.net/3.0/MultiISP.html
> > I am not clear on how the DNS resolution happens if a DNS request
> > from one provid
Hello,
I am trying to configure multi-isp system using the latest
Bering-uClibc 3.1-beta1. I have two dual port cards (first
is e100 based driver and the second is tulip) and they are
all recognized and able to assign IP. I have a block of 32
and 8 IPs respectively from each ISP that I am trying t
> > I am trying to configure multi-isp system using the latest
> > Bering-uClibc 3.1-beta1. I have two dual port cards (first
> > is e100 based driver and the second is tulip) and they are
> > all recognized and able to assign IP. I have a block of 32
> > and 8 IPs respectively from each ISP that I
> > I am trying to configure multi-isp system using the latest
> > Bering-uClibc 3.1-beta1. I have two dual port cards (first
> > is e100 based driver and the second is tulip) and they are
> > all recognized and able to assign IP. I have a block of 32
> > and 8 IPs respectively from each ISP that I
Quoting Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> I am trying to configure multi-isp system using the latest
> >>> Bering-uClibc 3.1-beta1. I have two dual port cards (first
> >>> is e100 based driver and the second is tulip) and they are
> >>> all recognized and able to ass
> > I am trying to configure multi-isp system using the latest
> > Bering-uClibc 3.1-beta1. I have two dual port cards (first
> > is e100 based driver and the second is tulip) and they are
> > all recognized and able to assign IP. I have a block of 32
> > and 8 IPs respectively
Hello all,
I have couple more questions:
1. What is the best and quickest way to make one or two changes and
restart the shorewall so that a down ISP is removed from load
balancing and the live isp gets all the load?
2. We have a split dns and serve all outside requests for name resolution.
We h
Quoting Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > 1. What is the best and quickest way to make one or two changes and
> > restart the shorewall so that a down ISP is removed from load
> > balancing and the live isp gets all the load?
> >
>
> Simply set the 'optional' opti
14 matches
Mail list logo
