Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

On 11/10/2015 8:00 AM, PGNet Dev wrote: >> Have you checked your .rpmmacros file? > > cat ~/.rpmmacros > %_topdir %(echo $HOME)/rpmbuild > > %_smp_mflags %( \ > [ -z "$RPM_BUILD_NCPUS" ] \\\ > && RPM_BUILD_NCPUS="`/usr/bin/nproc 2>/dev/null || \\\ >

Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

On 11/09/2015 07:20 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: >> I don't see how this can be a defect in build50: >> >> teastep@gateway:~/shorewall/tools/build$ fgrep rpmbuild build50 >> do_rpmbuild() { >> RPM=yes rpmbuild --target noarch-linux $@ >> $LOGFILE 2>&1 >> do_or_die do_rpmbuild "-ba

Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

> Have you checked your .rpmmacros file? cat ~/.rpmmacros %_topdir %(echo $HOME)/rpmbuild %_smp_mflags %( \ [ -z "$RPM_BUILD_NCPUS" ] \\\ && RPM_BUILD_NCPUS="`/usr/bin/nproc 2>/dev/null || \\\ /usr/bin/getconf

Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

> I don't see how this can be a defect in build50: > > teastep@gateway:~/shorewall/tools/build$ fgrep rpmbuild build50 > do_rpmbuild() { > RPM=yes rpmbuild --target noarch-linux $@ >> $LOGFILE 2>&1 > do_or_die do_rpmbuild "-ba $RPMDIR/SPECS/${2}.spec" >

Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:20:46 -0800 PGNet Dev wrote: > > I don't see how this can be a defect in build50: > > > > teastep@gateway:~/shorewall/tools/build$ fgrep rpmbuild build50 > > do_rpmbuild() { > > RPM=yes rpmbuild --target noarch-linux $@ >> $LOGFILE 2>&1 > >

Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

On 11/9/2015 3:33 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/09/2015 08:29 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: >> On 11/09/2015 07:24 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: >> >>> >>> I realized this morning that this is most likely due to missing 5.0.1 >>> tracking branches. In that case, the build will use the 'master' branch >>> which is

Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

On 11/08/2015 07:53 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: > On 11/8/2015 6:20 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: >> Building v5x using the newly available 'build50' script, the tarball >> Building target platforms: noarch-linux >> Building for target noarch-linux >> >> Step "do_rpmbuild

Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

On 11/09/2015 07:24 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: > > I realized this morning that this is most likely due to missing 5.0.1 > tracking branches. In that case, the build will use the 'master' branch > which is 5.0.2-RC1. > > In both the 'release' and 'trunk' repositories, you will need to create > a

Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

On 11/09/2015 08:29 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: > On 11/09/2015 07:24 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: > >> >> I realized this morning that this is most likely due to missing 5.0.1 >> tracking branches. In that case, the build will use the 'master' branch >> which is 5.0.2-RC1. >> >> In both the 'release' and

Re: [Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

On 11/8/2015 6:20 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: > Building v5x using the newly available 'build50' script, the tarball > build's OK > > build50 -tcslL6ix 5.0.1.1 > ... > Creating > /usr/local/src/SHOREWALL-BUILD/build/shorewall-docs-xml-5.0.1.1 tarballs >

[Shorewall-users] SW v5-specific "build50" script: OK for tarball build, fails @ rpm build ?

Building v5x using the newly available 'build50' script, the tarball build's OK build50 -tcslL6ix 5.0.1.1 ... Creating /usr/local/src/SHOREWALL-BUILD/build/shorewall-docs-xml-5.0.1.1 tarballs Shorewall 5.0.1.1 Build complete - Sun Nov 8