On 10/4/2014 8:12 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 08:03:38PM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
Yes -- all of the packages depend directly or indirectly on
Shorewall-core. Shorewall-init has no direct dependency, but to do
anything useful, it requires on one of the four packages
When installing tarball builds on a remote, the installer seems perfectly happy
to install ONLY the
shorewall-core shorewall-lite shorewall6-lite shorewall-init
products.
Nothing in the installer output that I've noticed, nor any output of cursory
checks of
shorewall-lite
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 04:34:41PM -0700, PGNd wrote:
What's actually the design-intended dependency set by upstream SW?
Does any part of a remote-only install -- products = shorewall-core
shorewall-lite shorewall6-lite shorewall-init -- require the install of the
full products as well?
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014, at 04:46 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I've packaged the Debian versions of shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite
to only depend on iptables, iproute, and bc. You should not even need
shorewall-core.
That's a different prereq setup, then, than my current sample set of both
On 10/4/2014 5:15 PM, PGNd wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014, at 04:46 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I've packaged the Debian versions of shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite
to only depend on iptables, iproute, and bc. You should not even need
shorewall-core.
That's a different prereq setup, then,
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014, at 05:34 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
What possible reason would there have been to develop the -lite products
if they depended on the full products on the same system? The -lite
products depend on Shorewall Core only.
I don't know what was designed or why; hence, I ask.
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 05:34:00PM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
What possible reason would there have been to develop the -lite products
if they depended on the full products on the same system? The -lite
products depend on Shorewall Core only.
Lorenzo originally packaged the -lite products as
