Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-18 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2017-02-17 21:26, Benny Pedersen wrote: > problem is that default openrc have default rc.conf that here does > not start shorewall6 > > so it for me not shorewall problem at all, i do not use gentoo > build kernel, since linode.com uses

Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-17 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/17/17 15:26, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Thomas Deutschmann skrev den 2017-02-17 15:45: > >> Yes, I am here :) >> >> But I do not understand your problem. What's your problem with >> shorewall and shorewall6 both providing "firewall"? > > problem is that default openrc have default rc.conf

Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-17 Thread Benny Pedersen
Thomas Deutschmann skrev den 2017-02-17 15:45: > Yes, I am here :) > > But I do not understand your problem. What's your problem with > shorewall and shorewall6 both providing "firewall"? problem is that default openrc have default rc.conf that here does not start shorewall6 so it for me not

Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-17 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2017-02-17 17:10, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 02/16/17 17:23, Tom Eastep wrote: >> Which init system is the system using? > > Gentoo uses OpenRC. No, the question was right. Gentoo is about choices. You can currently use OpenRC or systemd. -

Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-17 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/16/17 17:23, Tom Eastep wrote: > Which init system is the system using? Gentoo uses OpenRC. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net p...@co.ordinate.org Landline: 603.293.8485 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-17 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2017-02-16 23:56, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Tom Eastep skrev den 2017-02-16 23:29: > >> I sounds like it is Gentoo-specific, in which case I can't help >> you. We at shorewall.net do not release any Gentoo-specific init >> scripts or .service

Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-16 Thread Benny Pedersen
Tom Eastep skrev den 2017-02-16 23:29: > I sounds like it is Gentoo-specific, in which case I can't help you. > We at shorewall.net do not release any Gentoo-specific init scripts or > .service files. hopefully gentoo ebuild maintainers still listen here ?

Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-16 Thread Benny Pedersen
Tom Eastep skrev den 2017-02-16 23:23: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/16/2017 11:49 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> i have problem with this now in current stable shorewall on gentoo >> where shorewall-init shorewall shorewall6 is in rc-update as >> dokumented >> i

Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-16 Thread Tom Eastep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/16/2017 02:23 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: > On 02/16/2017 11:49 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> i have problem with this now in current stable shorewall on >> gentoo where shorewall-init shorewall shorewall6 is in rc-update >> as dokumented > >> i

Re: [Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-16 Thread Tom Eastep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/16/2017 11:49 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > i have problem with this now in current stable shorewall on gentoo > where shorewall-init shorewall shorewall6 is in rc-update as > dokumented > > i noticed that shorewall and shorewall6 both provide

[Shorewall-users] shorewall6 not starting on gentoo

2017-02-16 Thread Benny Pedersen
i have problem with this now in current stable shorewall on gentoo where shorewall-init shorewall shorewall6 is in rc-update as dokumented i noticed that shorewall and shorewall6 both provide firewall ? should shorewall6 not provide firewall6 in init rc ? help me understand why it does not