Here are the draft minutes from IETF78 in Maastricht. Thanks to Vesna
Manojlovic for volunteering to produce the minutes.
Please send corrections, comments, additions, etc., to the list. Final
minutes are due 15 Sept.
These minutes have been uploaded to the IETF web site.
--Sandy
Secure
I think Matt's message to the list of 20 Aug 2010 included a revised
version of the roa format that would make use of the generic signed object
draft.
If the generic signed object draft is adopted by the wg, then the roa
format draft authors will have the opportunity to change the roa format
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the sidr
meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is
We had a discussion in April on the list regarding removing TLS from the
provisioning protocol. Rob Austein presented his views on the issue at
the sidr meeting at the IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am calling for wg consensus on the question. Should the authors of
Geoff Huston has requested that the working group adopt the draft
CA Key Rollover in the RPKI draft-huston-sidr-keyroll-00.txt. This
draft was announced on July 26. This wg chair apologizes to the authors
for the delay in making the requested wg call for adoption.
The draft is available at
Geoff is correct, I did miss making the requested wg call for adoption.
--Sandy, speaking as wg chair
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Geoff Huston wrote:
The Working Group chairs have also received a request from the authors of
draft-huston-sidr-keyroll-00.txt on the 26th July that the working group
The authors of Certificate Policy (CP) for the Resource PKI (RPKI) have
requested a working group last call on this draft. The draft is available
at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-cp-10.
The authors indicate that the following changes have been made:
1. Added 147 RFC 2119
Forgot to add the obligatory coda...
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:
I think Matt's message to the list of 20 Aug 2010 included a revised version
of the roa format that would make use of the generic signed object draft.
If the generic signed object draft is adopted by the wg, then
Forgot to add the obligatory coda:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the sidr
meeting in
Forgot to add the obligatory coda:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:
We had a discussion in April on the list regarding removing TLS from the
provisioning protocol. Rob Austein presented his views on the issue at the
sidr meeting at the IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am calling for wg
I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg consensus
that draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative format.
yes, please.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
I am calling for wg consensus on the question. Should the authors of
draft-ietf-sidr-rescerts-provisioning-06 revise that draft to remove TLS
from the protocol?
yes, please
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
I support this change.
Robert
On 2010.08.25. 10:18, Sandra Murphy wrote:
We had a discussion in April on the list regarding removing TLS from the
provisioning protocol. Rob Austein presented his views on the issue at the
sidr meeting at the IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am calling for wg consensus
I am calling for wg consensus on the question. Should the authors of
draft-ietf-sidr-rescerts-provisioning-06 revise that draft to remove TLS from
the protocol?
I support this revision.
Sriram
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
I support adoption of this draft as a WG item.
-george
On 25/08/2010, at 6:23 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Geoff Huston has requested that the working group adopt the draft CA Key
Rollover in the RPKI draft-huston-sidr-keyroll-00.txt. This draft was
announced on July 26. This wg chair
At 4:18 AM -0400 8/25/10, Sandra Murphy wrote:
We had a discussion in April on the list regarding removing TLS from
the provisioning protocol. Rob Austein presented his views on the
issue at the sidr meeting at the IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am calling for wg consensus on the question. Should
I support this
Gary
On 25/08/2010, at 6:23 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Geoff Huston has requested that the working group adopt the draft CA Key
Rollover in the RPKI draft-huston-sidr-keyroll-00.txt. This draft was
announced on July 26. This wg chair apologizes to the authors for the delay
On 8/26/10 8:26 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
At 4:18 AM -0400 8/25/10, Sandra Murphy wrote:
We had a discussion in April on the list regarding removing TLS from
the provisioning protocol. Rob Austein presented his views on the
issue at the sidr meeting at the IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am calling
I support the use of this alternative format.
Cheers
Terry
On 25/08/10 6:25 PM, Sandra Murphy sandra.mur...@sparta.com wrote:
Forgot to add the obligatory coda:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
trust
I support adoption and am willing to review.
Rob
On 25/08/2010, at 18:23, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Geoff Huston has requested that the working group adopt the draft CA Key
Rollover in the RPKI draft-huston-sidr-keyroll-00.txt. This draft was
announced on July 26. This wg chair apologizes to
At 4:18 AM -0400 8/25/10, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an
alternate trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the
sidr meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am
On 26/08/2010, at 9:27 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
At 4:18 AM -0400 8/25/10, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the
Also, I would not characterize the question as you did above. Isn't
the proposal for a (hopefully revised) version of Sam's draft to
replace sidr-ta-04?
indeed. sam's draft should replace.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
23 matches
Mail list logo
