- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Morrow"
To: ; ; "Sean Turner" ;
"t.petch"
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-01.txt
Sean/Tom,
Tom had some comments on the previous (I believe) version of this
draft, are the
Tom,
Responses inline.
spt
On 4/13/12 6:33 AM, t.petch wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Morrow"
To:;; "Sean Turner";
"t.petch"
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-01.txt
Sean/Tom,
Tom had some comme
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Turner"
To: "t.petch"
Cc: "Christopher Morrow" ; ;
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 2:19 PM
> Tom,
>
> Responses inline.
>
Sean
yes, that looks fine
Tom
> spt
>
> On 4/13/12 6:33 AM, t.petch wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Christophe
Tom,
Okay posting new version shortly.
spt
On 4/13/12 1:32 PM, t.petch wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Turner"
To: "t.petch"
Cc: "Christopher Morrow";;
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 2:19 PM
Tom,
Responses inline.
Sean
yes, that looks fine
Tom
spt
On 4/13/12 6:33 AM
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : A Profile for BGPSEC Router Certificates, Certificate
Revocation Lists, and Certification Requests
Helo WG peoples,
The following update posted today. Sean and Tom have come to agreement
on their differences, I believe this closes the last open items on
this document.
Let's start a WGLC for this, ending: 4/27/2012 or 27/4/2012
Thanks!
-Chris
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:03 PM, wrote:
>
> A Ne
While I think the document may be pretty solid currently, the meta-issue of
the tail wagging the dog exists.
I.e. There still exists the potential for additional requirements to
surface,
related to the design and implementation of the bgpsec protocol, which have
the potential to "inform" additiona
At the risk of opening a can of worms (or at least seeing a cylindrical
hollow metal labeled "Caution: contains worms")...
I believe the larger issue is, that Authentication is orthogonal to
Authorization.
As it currently stands, only Authentication has been given any
consideration, per se.
The
