Dear WG participants,
I would like to initiate 2+ weeks poll (ending on December 31st 2012)
regarding acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02.txt. Please
reply to questions listed below. Send your replies to the mailing list
or directly to WG chairs . I would like to
avoid extended di
On 12/12/2012 19:56, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Dear WG participants,
I would like to initiate 2+ weeks poll (ending on December 31st 2012)
BTW, if people think that this date should be postponed due to holiday
season, that would be fine with me.
regarding acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparent
On Dec 12, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Dear WG participants,
>
> I would like to initiate 2+ weeks poll (ending on December 31st 2012)
> regarding acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02.txt. Please reply
> to questions listed below. Send your replies to the mailing lis
>> "For this reason, it is recommended that routers in this scenario been
>> provisioned with two certificates: one to sign BGP UPDATES in transit
>> and a second one to sign BGP UPDATE for prefixes originated in its
>> AS. Only the second certificate (for prefixes originated in its AS)
>
Hi Alexey & WG,
On 13/12/2012, at 5:56 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> 1) Is the problem described/solved by draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02
> actually a problem that the WG needs to address? (Answer: yes or no.
> Additional information is welcomed, but I don't want people to repeat the
> whol
Alexey and WG,
On 13/12/12 5:56 AM, "Alexey Melnikov" wrote:
> Dear WG participants,
>
> I would like to initiate 2+ weeks poll (ending on December 31st 2012)
I think you should extend this by 2 weeks.
>
> 1) Is the problem described/solved by draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02
> actually a
