I posed some questions about this in my WGLC review of bgpsec spec, but
haven't heard anything back. Current schedule has this being evaluated by
IESG prior to our next meeting. If we need to discuss during the meeting
in Dallas, we could certainly delay processing of the document. It has a
normati
sounds like a good topic for the mic/front/preso in dallas... to me at least.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:34 AM, George, Wes wrote:
> I posed some questions about this in my WGLC review of bgpsec spec, but
> haven't heard anything back. Current schedule has this being evaluated by
> IESG prior to ou
>It might be possible for an attacker to take a valid signature of data from
>the structure in 4.2,
>and present it as a valid signature of the same bytes interpreted with the
>structure in 4.1.
If you have worked out a concrete example showing how the attack works,
it would be good to see th