[sidr] Last Call: (The Profile for Algorithms and Key Sizes for use in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure) to Proposed Standard

The IESG has received a request from the Secure Inter-Domain Routing WG (sidr) to consider the following document: - 'The Profile for Algorithms and Key Sizes for use in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks,

[sidr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-12.txt

Thanks to everyone for the energetic work in the last couple of weeks, the last few days in particular. The draft has passed the IESG. Congratulations to the authors in particular! —Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: > From:

[sidr] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-12: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-12.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing of the IETF. Title : Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures Authors : Robert Kisteleki

Re: [sidr] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

One further point... Dropping step 1 in section 3.2 is one part of this change. I think that the fourth bullet in section 5 can be dropped as well. Thoughts? Regards, Brian On 5/19/16 8:11 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > Hiya Stephen, > > On 5/18/16 5:23 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> >> Hi Sandy,

Re: [sidr] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hiya Stephen, On 5/18/16 5:23 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hi Sandy, > > On 18/05/16 22:12, Sandra Murphy wrote: >> comments inline. speaking as a regular ol’ wg member >> >> On May 18, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Brian Haberman >> wrote: >> >>> Hiya Stephen, >>> >>> On

Re: [sidr] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi all, Actually, yes, I agree with George on in-line. In-line would have my preference. Include the entire EE certificate in the signature field. This way it does not need to be fetched separately, and it does not need to appear in a repository or a manifest. Mandate that the EE certificate