Re: [sidr] revising Section 7.2 of RFC 6487

2016-06-28 Thread Geoff Huston
Thanks! I am now very comfortable with your text on this. Geoff > On 29 Jun 2016, at 3:39 AM, Stephen Kent wrote: > > Geoff, > > Thanks for reviewing the text. > > I modified the text to change "current VRS-IP" to be "... the value of the > VRS-IP computed for certificate x-1" as per your

[sidr] rpki-tree-validation vs. madi-sidr-rp

2016-06-28 Thread Stephen Kent
Although I was not present at the BA SIDR meeting, I did participate remotely for one of the sessions. I recall the discussion of the I-D that tries to collect all of the RP requirements in one place, with cites to the sources of these requirements. It part, I recall folks at the mic arguing th

Re: [sidr] revising Section 7.2 of RFC 6487

2016-06-28 Thread Stephen Kent
Geoff, Thanks for reviewing the text. I modified the text to change "current VRS-IP" to be "... the value of the VRS-IP computed for certificate x-1" as per your suggestion. I also made this change for the corresponding VRS-AS text. I don't think we need to add a note about validation being