Thanks! I am now very comfortable with your text on this.
Geoff
> On 29 Jun 2016, at 3:39 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
>
> Geoff,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the text.
>
> I modified the text to change "current VRS-IP" to be "... the value of the
> VRS-IP computed for certificate x-1" as per your
Although I was not present at the BA SIDR meeting, I did participate
remotely for one of the sessions. I recall the discussion of the I-D
that tries to collect all of the RP requirements in one place, with
cites to the sources of these requirements. It part, I recall folks at
the mic arguing th
Geoff,
Thanks for reviewing the text.
I modified the text to change "current VRS-IP" to be "... the value of
the VRS-IP computed for certificate x-1" as per your suggestion. I also
made this change for the corresponding VRS-AS text.
I don't think we need to add a note about validation being