Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

2016-07-21 Thread Chris Morrow
At Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:42:07 -0400, Stephen Kent wrote: > > Sandy & Chris, > > I believe Chris' declaration is premature. > > I anticipate that Dr. Ma may want to take over slurm, with David's > permission. > > With a few minor tweaks the use cases doc can be done. ok, let's

Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

2016-07-21 Thread Stephen Kent
Sandy & Chris, I believe Chris' declaration is premature. I anticipate that Dr. Ma may want to take over slurm, with David's permission. With a few minor tweaks the use cases doc can be done. Steve ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org

Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

2016-07-21 Thread Sandra Murphy
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote: > > >> On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Chris Morrow wrote: >> >> >> We are going to officially stake: >> 1) draft-ietf-sidr-slurm > > Hasn’t had energy in a while, but not so long that I can

Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

2016-07-21 Thread Sandra Murphy
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Chris Morrow wrote: > > > We are going to officially stake: > 1) draft-ietf-sidr-slurm Hasn’t had energy in a while, but not so long that I can say there’s no possibility of resurrection. (e.g., keyroll had a two year gap in there.

[sidr] SIDR operations area proposed Charter

2016-07-21 Thread Chris Morrow
Howdy! as promised in the meeting today (berlin july 21 2016): I believe this is the current proposed charter for a group in the ops-area, I (and sandy) would appreciate comments/questions/help/text on this proposal, as we would like

[sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

2016-07-21 Thread Chris Morrow
We are going to officially stake: 1) draft-ietf-sidr-slurm 2) draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases These are not being progressed currently, and won't be in the future it seems. We'll do the process bits next week to remove them from SIDR's work queue. -chris

Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 extension OIDs

2016-07-21 Thread Tim Bruijnzeels
Hi Russ, Thank you for the pointers. I am traveling now but I will get back to it. Thanks Tim > On 21 Jul 2016, at 10:56, Russ Housley wrote: > > > On Jul 19, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Rob Austein > wrote: > >> At Tue, 19 Jul 2016

Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 extension OIDs

2016-07-21 Thread Russ Housley
On Jul 19, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Rob Austein wrote: > At Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:43:00 -0400, Russ Housley wrote: >> >> Does this apply to the Certificate Policy OID too? If memory is >> correct, the current CP has a normative pinter to RFC 3779. > > Good catch. > > Not sure a

Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-18.txt

2016-07-21 Thread Sean Turner
Changes as a result of discussions inspired by the validation reconsidered draft. spt > On Jul 21, 2016, at 04:49, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain

[sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-18.txt

2016-07-21 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing of the IETF. Title : A Profile for BGPsec Router Certificates, Certificate Revocation Lists, and Certification Requests Authors