Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

2016-07-22 Thread Randy Bush
> 1) use-cases - decide on tweaks & rev-document: Aug 1 > review and WGLC Aug 14 > send to IESG Sept 1 do we have a concise issue list (other than steve not liking the style used)? not sure i will make the 1 aug dreadline if i have to sift through the mailing

Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

2016-07-22 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > 1) use-cases - decide on tweaks & rev-document: Aug 1 > > review and WGLC Aug 14 > > send to IESG Sept 1 > > do we have a concise issue list (other than steve not liking the style > used)? not sure i will

Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

2016-07-22 Thread Declan Ma
Sandy & Chris, Thank Steve for recommending me to take over SLURM. With David’s permission, I would be happy to assume responsibility for SLURM. I think SLURM is quite important to RPKI operation in term of local network. SLURM provides a simple way to enable INR holders to establish a local,

Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

2016-07-22 Thread Stephen Kent
Chris, Here is my message to the SIDR list from 6/16: I read the latest version of this document and have a few comments, some of which I have made before, to no avail ;-). I still find the wording of the three examples in Section 4 to be unnecessarily informal. I’ve provided sugge