[sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-publication - ENDS: 08/18/2016 - August 18, 2016

Good morning (european folks): This starts the 2 week (14 days or 336 hr) WGLC for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-publication-08 Abstract content: "This document defines a protocol for publishing Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) objects. Even though the RPKI will

Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-publication-08.txt

Ok, since we have cycled this document a few times and the last set(s) of comments were dealt with, I'm going to send a WGLC note, let's get chatty on that thread? On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Samuel Weiler wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Rob Austein wrote: > > Protocol

Re: [sidr] adverse actions -01 posted

Randy Tim offered no suggestion for a different term, which is not helpful. the suggestion was "unwanted". I reread Tim's message; I don't interpret it as having suggested "unwanted" as an alternative. that is clear. others, such as matthias and i, did. but this is not productive. to be

Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 extension OIDs

- Original Message - From: "Sean Turner" To: "t.petch" Cc: "Rob Austein" ; "IETF SIDR" Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 2:20 PM On Aug 02, 2016, at 05:30, t.petch wrote: > > Sean > > I am a fan of

Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 extension OIDs

On Aug 02, 2016, at 05:30, t.petch wrote: > > Sean > > I am a fan of giving IANA as little a need to think as possible so would > prefer the IANA considerations to be more expansive. With three > registries being updated, I would like to see three paragraphs and, with >

Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 extension OIDs

Sean I am a fan of giving IANA as little a need to think as possible so would prefer the IANA considerations to be more expansive. With three registries being updated, I would like to see three paragraphs and, with five numbers, would like to see TBD1 to TBD5, not TBD times five, e.g. IANA is

Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

Hi Randy, I did. Thank you very much. Do you think that a notice to law enforcement about how this action would be ineffective and counter-productive has a place in your analysis? Something along the lines of what I suggested earlier: Law enforcement would be ill-advised to take this