Re: [sidr] Routing policy based on RPKI

x27;t make live easy. So I'd be building my routing policies on a steady state (and ROA databases would, with time, converge to a steady state). Any thoughts on the reasoning I made for not prefering valids over unknowns? Jac -- Jac Kloots Netw

Re: [sidr] Routing policy based on RPKI

t to set the preference correctly through your routing policy so that R1 prefers R3 (assume R1 does not yet support origin validation). This thus won't happen. Jac -- Jac Kloots Network Services SURFnet bv ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Re: [sidr] Routing policy based on RPKI

aren't covered by a ROA they will be Unknown, goto 1. Knowing this, I can't think of a reason to prefer valid routes over unknowns and that makes defining a routing policy (as shown in slide 8) a whole lot easier. Jac Thanks matthias -- Jac

Re: [sidr] NotFound vs Uninitialized

er, was there a difficulty? a need not met by just 3 states? can you say what it was? --Sandy, speaking as regular ol' wg member ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr -- Jac Kloots Network

Re: [sidr] time

this" not that it believed it. subtle. randy -- Jac Kloots Network Services SURFnet bv ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Re: [sidr] time

mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr -- Jac Kloots Network Services SURFnet bv___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr