Hi David,
On 2/10/15, 1:48 PM, David Mandelberg da...@mandelberg.org wrote:
All, while coming up with the example below, I realized another issue.
The structure in 4.1 doesn't include an Address Family Identifier.
Unless I missed something, this means that a signature for 1.2.0.0/16
would be
Hi Bruno,
On 6/14/14 9:57 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com
bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Hi Keyur,
From: Keyur Patel (keyupate) [mailto:keyup...@cisco.com] Sent:
Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:07 AM
Hi Bruno,
On 6/13/14 2:02 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com
bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote
I support publication of this document as RFC.
Regards,
Keyur
On 1/10/14 5:38 PM, Chris Morrow morr...@ops-netman.net wrote:
Working Group Folken,
Today starts a WGLC for the subject draft:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-reqs
Abstract:
This document describes
Support adoption.
Regards,
Keyur
On 1/10/14 12:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@parsons.com wrote:
There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four
is not a strong indication of wg wishes here.
Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do
