Support adoption.

Regards,
Keyur

On 1/10/14 12:33 PM, "Murphy, Sandra" <sandra.mur...@parsons.com> wrote:

>There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive.  But four
>is not a strong indication of wg wishes here.
>
>Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do
>not support adoption?
>
>Recall: silence does not indicate interest.
>
>We give this another two weeks (for people who are taking a Christmas
>present holiday in some warm climate).
>
>Repond by 24 Jan 2014.  Please.
>
>--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
>________________________________________
>From: Chris Morrow [morr...@ops-netman.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:39 PM
>To: sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org; sidr wg list
>Subject: WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
>
>Howdy gentle WG folks,
>The authors of:
>  <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00>
>
>are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed
>text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption.
>
>The abstract says:
>  "There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized
>   routing domain needs to augment or modify the Global RPKI.  This
>   document attempts to outline a few of them."
>
>Please consider this a 'WG Adoption' call, and let's attempt to close
>this out by:
>  12/9/2013 or 9/12/2013 or Ninth December Twenty-Thirteen or ... you
>get the point, see you in 2 weeks with (hopefully) clear direction from
>the folks behind the emailz.
>
>-chris
>co-chair
>_______________________________________________
>sidr mailing list
>sidr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to