Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

2012-05-04 Thread John G. Scudder
A few things in addition to what others have said: On May 3, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Chris Morrow wrote: o shared slides prior to the meeting (no slides, no slot. potentially) We covered a fair amount of ground at the interim without using slides at all. Based on that, I'm not sure where this

Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

2012-05-04 Thread Chris Morrow
On 05/04/2012 03:42 PM, John G. Scudder wrote: A few things in addition to what others have said: On May 3, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Chris Morrow wrote: o shared slides prior to the meeting (no slides, no slot. potentially) We covered a fair amount of ground at the interim without using

Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

2012-05-04 Thread Randy Bush
We covered a fair amount of ground at the interim without using slides at all. Based on that, I'm not sure where this (possible) requirement comes from? I, for one, am not at all keen to prepare slide decks just for the fun of it, and I looked at lack of slides at the interim as a plus, not a

Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

2012-05-03 Thread Randy Bush
1) late start/technology fail with the webex (probably webex operations failures more than anything - my fault) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_check 6) microphone discipline for in-room vs external folks, often the in-room folk displayed (me too) an inability to wait their

Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

2012-05-03 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:   1) late start/technology fail with the webex (probably webex       operations failures more than anything - my fault) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_check   6) microphone discipline for in-room vs external folks, often the

Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

2012-05-03 Thread Samuel Weiler
On Thu, 3 May 2012, Chris Morrow wrote: I'd also (and sandy as well) would like some feedback on this message, the meeting, and suggestions for what a direction forward might be. I will observe that my support for having interims was conditioned on improving the remote participation

Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

2012-05-03 Thread Murphy, Sandra
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Samuel Weiler [wei...@watson.org] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 3:43 PM To: Chris Morrow Cc: sidr-...@tools.ietf.org; sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org; sidr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout

[sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

2012-05-02 Thread Chris Morrow
Howdy, for the folks that attended in person, and remotely I think we (chairs) would like to get some feedback on how the meeting was done. I think we know of a few stumbling blocks: 1) late start/technology fail with the webex (probably webex operations failures more than anything - my