Re: [sidr] rpki-tree-validation vs. madi-sidr-rp

Tim, > 在 2016年6月30日，22:46，Tim Bruijnzeels 写道： > > Hi, > > The point that I was trying to make, but maybe not clearly, is that > rpki-tree-validation is indeed intended as an Informational document > specifically detailing our implementation only, but that the RP implementers

Re: [sidr] rpki-tree-validation vs. madi-sidr-rp

Hi, The point that I was trying to make, but maybe not clearly, is that rpki-tree-validation is indeed intended as an Informational document specifically detailing our implementation only, but that the RP implementers discussed earlier during WG sessions that we might want to create a

Re: [sidr] rpki-tree-validation vs. madi-sidr-rp

Hi, all, Speaking as the co-author of ‘Requirements for Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Relying Parties’, In addition to the clarification made by Steve, I would like to deliver a clear message here that this draft is intended to make the RP requirements well framed, which are

[sidr] rpki-tree-validation vs. madi-sidr-rp

Although I was not present at the BA SIDR meeting, I did participate remotely for one of the sessions. I recall the discussion of the I-D that tries to collect all of the RP requirements in one place, with cites to the sources of these requirements. It part, I recall folks at the mic arguing