Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-07-03 Thread Randy Bush
> The authors believe that draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04 ("An > Out-Of-Band Setup Protocol For RPKI Production Services”) is mature > and ready for a working group last call. i read it i use it ship it ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-07-07 Thread Sean Turner
I read this document and it looks good to progress. If you get some other editor comments along the way you might slip in a reference to s4 of RFC 4648 for Base64, but please don’t stop progressing this document to wait for this nitty comment. spt > On Jul 02, 2016, at 14:59, Sandra Murphy wr

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-07-08 Thread Oleg Muravskiy
> On 02 Jul 2016, at 20:59, Sandra Murphy wrote: > > The authors believe that draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04 ("An Out-Of-Band > Setup Protocol For RPKI Production Services”) is mature and ready for a > working group last call. We use (parts of) it in production. It works. So ship it. Ole

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-07-09 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
I have given it a quick read. Reads good. I support publication. Nit: BPKI acronym is used earlier but the expansion (Business 'PKI') is stated only in Section 2 for the first time. I think mentioning the expansion on first use of the acronym in the Introduction would be good -- you may take c

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-07-14 Thread Sandra Murphy
Responses have been a bit light on this wglc. A few more days left - please give this draft a read and respond. —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs > On Jul 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote: > > The authors believe that draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04 ("An Out-Of-Band > Se

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-07-15 Thread Tim Bruijnzeels
Hi, As Oleg already mentioned. We use the setup w.r.t. the provisioning protocol - we already implemented an older version of the document but the XML was easy to change. We have no code related to the publication client-server setup, but I see no issues there - and I know Rob does have an impl

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-07-15 Thread Tim Bruijnzeels
to be clear: I meant support.. > On 15 Jul 2016, at 19:43, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: > > Hi, > > As Oleg already mentioned. We use the setup w.r.t. the provisioning protocol > - we already implemented an older version of the document but the XML was > easy to change. We have no code related to

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-08-19 Thread Sandra Murphy
Sufficient responses received to judge wg consensus for publication. A publication request will be coming. —Sandy > On Jul 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote: > > The authors believe that draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04 ("An Out-Of-Band > Setup Protocol For RPKI Production Services