Hello,
Does anyone know what criteria were used to choose the cutoff radii and the core
correction parameter for the carbon pseudopotential found on the SIESTA website?
--
pe C
tm2 2.0
Cpb
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
14
2
Sorry I didn't notice the use of the libraries because I'm not using
linalg.a.
But still Denchar don't need any library so you can simply comment the
LIBS=
and
COMP_LIBS=
flags in arch.make
and every thing must be ok
The message related to libfdf.a is platform dependent, your program
might
Hi,
In principal you don't need linalg.a for Denchar !!
be sure that you are using the right makefile (not the one that comes
in Src) you just need arch.make that you already used to compile
siesta.
Then it is possible that you will encounter the following error
"libfdf.a has no table of conte
So matrices for the last step are final matrices?
- Original Message Follows -
From: Xiao Changyong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SIESTA-L@LISTSERV.UAM.ES
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] S & H Matrices
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:59:30 +0800
>
> Hi,
>
> In fact, the variation of H and S happened with ever
Dear All :
if you got that ( macroave manual in PDF ) , please mail to me ,
thanxliger chen
Dear All :
As title , If you got that, please mail to me , thx
And ... i have got some problem on makeing( compling) the Denchar ...
I use the intel fortain complier , then i have complied the SIESTA
successfully. but , after buttoning the ' make ' , that say :
Compilation architecture to b
Hi,
The reason you need different parameters for zigzag and armchair nanotubes is
that the zigzag are semiconducting whereas the armchair are metallic. So it is
reasonable that you have to use a bigger number of k points to integrate the
Brillouin zone in the last case.
For armchair NT I relax
Dear All,
I am having hard time compiling parallel siesta on my AMD opteron.
I use Intel compilers version 8.0 and mkl_lib version 7.2. It turns out the
performance
for parallel is not good. Any of your suggestion will be highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot
Ning Shi
Dear All,
I am doing some calculations on HfO2,and the calculation is difficult to
converge, Here is my input parameter related to SCF and CG:
DM.MixingWeight 0.04
DM.NumberPulay 3
MD.MaxCGDispl 0.03 Ang
MD.MaxForceTol 0.04 eV/Ang eV
The calculation was terminated after 1 CG ste
Dear All,
I am a new student to the field of calculation on carbon nanotube using
SIESTA.I would like to have a 2unit cell optimised structure of carbonnanotube
for 10-10 tube.I have already done 2 unit cell optimisation for zigzag nanotube
.My procedure was as follows.
1 Geometry optimisati
Hi,
In fact, the variation of H and S happened with every MD step. So, after
the termination of MD, the S and H are the final results.
Regards,
David, Xiao
==
Changyong XIAO, David.
Research Fellow, Department of Chemistry
National University of Singapore
3 Sc
11 matches
Mail list logo