Indium has 3d electrons, so your pseudo is quite hard and the energy
cutoff should be quite high even with LDA. Did you check the convergence?
hi antonio,
in your mail you mention about long range orbitals. in
some cases I have seen changes over 25% in Volume in you change the
energy shift from 0.02 to 0.01 Ry...
best regards,
pablo
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:48 +0200, antonio aliano wrote:
> t
thanks for the advices...
yes, actually i obtained overestimated lattice parameter (strange for LDA
calculation that's why I'm worried)
I will think about the pseduo and I will search (better than before) on
internet if there are better ones
Thank you very much
Regards
A.A.
2008/8/27 Marcos V
Ciao Antonio,
It is not clear if you have underestimation or overestimation of your
lattice parameter, in the end - you mention first an overestimation, then
the opposite... I'll suppose you are seeing an overestimation of the
lattice parameter in what follows.
Anyway, while it is usual for LDA t
Dear siesta user,
I'm simulating the zincblende structure of InN. I did my pseudo potential
with the Atom program to include the core correction and the semicore d
electron necessary in the description of In. Then I variationally choose
the basis set cut off radii for single and double 'z', single
5 matches
Mail list logo