Re: [SIESTA-L] Reg: Optical Property calculations.......

2012-05-22 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
lation* > > What is the parameter that has to be changed exactly in the source > code please help me > > On 23 May 2012 07:47, Marty Blaber wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> inside input.f90 there is a parameter that defines the maximum number of >> frequencie

Re: [SIESTA-L] Reg: Optical Property calculations.......

2012-05-22 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Hi, inside input.f90 there is a parameter that defines the maximum number of frequencies. You just need to increase the number and recompile the code. Cheers, Marty On May 22, 2012 8:56 PM, "acharya k.l.n." wrote: > Thank you Mr. Marty Blaber. finally i could generate .EPSIMG

Re: [SIESTA-L] Reg: Optical Property calculations.......

2012-05-22 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Hi! It is considered good netiquette to read the manual before posting to the mailing list. The manual says: Optical.NumberOfBands (integer): This option controls the number of bands that are in- cluded in the optical property calculation. The error says it can't find a number after the tag in t

Re: [SIESTA-L] optical error

2011-08-04 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Hi, The Optical.EnergyMaximum is one of the the correct parameters to increase to satisfy the f-sum. However, if you plot a density of states you will (probably) see that there are not very many states with that energy (90 eV). One option is to increase the size of your basis set (more basis funct

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] Possible reasion for the negative PDOS in TranSIESTA

2011-05-09 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Dear All, I believe this is a basis problem. See below from the archive. Marty http://www.mail-archive.com/siesta-l@listserv.uam.es/msg02951.html On 14/11/2004, at 6:42 AM, Javier Junquera wrote: Dear Rainer: When you are working with a non-orthogonal basis set, as is the case in Sies

Re: [SIESTA-L] can siesta calculate the doped graphene nano-ribbons correctly ?

2011-03-15 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Hi 陈阿青, I also mentioned that siesta may not predict the dispersion of the bands well. The optical response in siesta does not include any many body effects. In the experiment, the thing that is measured is the quasiparticle energy. This is the electron travelling from an occupied state to an unoc

Re: [SIESTA-L] how to reply the reviewer ?

2011-03-04 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Hi All, This email got a little longer than I expected. It is a general description of how you get to the equations that Siesta uses to calculate the optical properties, what they mean, and what the problems are with such a method. I tried to make it accessible to everyone. Please comment with que

Re: [SIESTA-L] How to fulfill the f_sum rule when using the optical module

2011-01-18 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Hi Lin Xiao, The f-sum rule says the integrated oscillator strength should be equal to the number of electrons. In siesta, the number of available unoccupied states is limited by the size of the basis set. Increase DZP to TZP or TZDP, and the f-sum should improve. Cheers, Marty On 18 January 201

Re: [SIESTA-L] How to include a "Drude term"?

2011-01-14 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
ppreciate your explaining.It really helps a lot. >> Thx again. >> xiaolin, from zju >> >> 2011/1/14 Marty Blaber >>> >>> Hi Lin Xiao, >>> >>> At the command line, you must type only: >>> >>> optical >>> >>>

Re: [SIESTA-L] How to include a "Drude term"?

2011-01-13 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Hi Lin Xiao, At the command line, you must type only: optical without the  Do you want to include a Drude term? >  This is typically needed for metals >  if yes: enter 1, if no: enter 0 and you may enter 1. Cheers, Marty On 12 January 2011 21:52, lin xiao wrote: > Dears, > I'm using the op

Re: [SIESTA-L] Carbon pseudopotential

2010-11-03 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Hi Aulia, In general, it is difficult to figure out your problem without the input and output files. However, maybe this will help: In the species block, you must include everything in the file name except the extension, eg: %block ChemicalSpeciesLabel 16 C.tm2 26 C.hsc %endbloc

Re: [SIESTA-L] Problem with constraints in siesta-trunk-320 version

2010-01-28 Por tôpico Marty Blaber
Hi Magda, Did you remember to include the %block GeometryConstraints routine constr %endblock GeometryConstraints in your fdf? (I only mention because I kept forgetting) Cheers, Marty On 29 January 2010 05:18, Magdalena Birowska wrote: > Dear siesta users; > > I used constr.f routine to im