-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/3/15 9:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
so the little hack above should be
- Is planning to use it within next 6 months
^ for multi-homing
make it applicable only for 32 bits ASNs.
(duck)
- -gaurab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
I agree with Owen
Regards
Mike
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
[mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2015 4:05 p.m.
To: Masato Yamanishi
Cc: sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal ]
Hi Dean,
You’ve resumed my thinking !
As long as it doesn't support allocation on nibble boundaries I will oppose it.
Regards,
Le 4 févr. 2015 à 14:54, Dean Pemberton d...@internetnz.net.nz a écrit :
There are a number of things that concern me about this proposal.
1) it doesn't
Hi Dean,
Thanks for raising the question.
Could I ask that the APNIC hostmasters to comment on the following:
Have you ever been made aware of a situation where due of the current
wording of the relevant clauses in the policy, a member or potential member
has not made a resource application
There are a number of things that concern me about this proposal.
1) it doesn't appear to support needs based allocation
2) it doesn't support allocation on nibble boundaries which operators have
said repeatedly is a major issue.
As such I do not support this proposal in its current form.
On
Dear community members
Due to the resignation of the Policy SIG Chair in September 2014, APNIC
is now seeking volunteers to serve as Chair and Co-Chair of the
APNIC Policy SIG.
The responsibilities are outlined in Sections 23, 24, and 25 of the
APNIC SIG Guidelines.
Hi Owen, Mike,
Thank you for your comments.
I'm the author of prop-112.
The purpose of this policy proposal is not to align the boundary but
to utilize unused space. Up to /29 is reserved for each /32 in the
legacy space.
| From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
I did actually think that... but Aftab rightly pointed out that there are
people who still can use them, due to their own equipment or due to their
upstreams.
...Skeeve
*Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
*v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com
Phone: 1300 239
On 4 February 2015 at 14:54, Dean Pemberton d...@internetnz.net.nz wrote:
There are a number of things that concern me about this proposal.
1) it doesn't appear to support needs based allocation
2) it doesn't support allocation on nibble boundaries which operators have
said repeatedly is a
Hi Randy,
i liked dean's question. is there actually a problem? have folk who
really needed asns not been able to get one under current policy?
Even, I liked Dean's question and would like to see what data hostmasters
have on this.
randy, thinking of reintroducing the no more policies
Dear SIG members
The proposal prop-112: On demand expansion of IPv6 address allocation
size in legacy IPv6 space has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 39 in Fukuoka,
Japan on Thursday, 5 March 2015.
We invite you to review and
11 matches
Mail list logo
