marketing. Need to
frame policy for the same. Any constructive feedback is welcome.
Regards,
Rajesh Panwala
For Smartlink Solutions Pvt Ltd
+91-9227886001
+91-9426110781
On Thu, 24 Aug, 2023, 13:28 Delong.com via SIG-policy, <
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 22, 2023
Hello Sunny and Team,
Is there any routing table analysis available, which shows how many of
these historical pools are really in use ( announced) ? This can help for
better decision making while framing policy.
Regards,
Rajesh Panwala
For Smartlink Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
+91-9227886001
+91
like India, leasing can be restricted to the licensed service area for
service provider within their designated service area.
This may stop majority of issues, barring few exceptions.
Some more brainstorming is required for better understanding and precise
implementation.
Regards,
Rajesh Panwala
Dear Team,
This policy need to be available for all members who has less than or equal
to /23 allocation , irrespective of their joining APNIC or NIR.
regards,
Rajesh Panwala
For Smartlink Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
+91-9227886001
+91-9426110781
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 3:32 AM Bertrand Cherrier
wrote
Dear Members,
I support the views of Chku. In case of M cases policy should be simple
enough and APNIC need to act as a facilitator.
Regards,
Rajesh Panwala
For Smartlink Solutions Pvt Ltd
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021, 9:55 AM chku wrote:
> Dear SIG members,
>
> A new version of the propo
Dear Team,
As statistics suggest, M cases are hardly 2 to 3% of the total
delegations. M are the routine business activities, and no one can
predict when will it happen .
I support the policy.
Rajesh Panwala
For Smartlink solutions Pvt. Ltd.
+91-9227886001
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:38 PM
I partially support the policy. For genuine M cases , there should not be
any restriction on transfer of resources. M activities are part and
parcel of routine business and no one knows when will it take place.
regards,
Rajesh Panwala
For Smartlink Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
+91-9227886001
On Fri, Jan
Dear Team
Policy in sync with other RIR, is more reasonable. I also think 2 years is
appropriate.
Rajesh Panwala
On 13-Oct-2017 11:35 AM, "steven.166" <steven@tom.com> wrote:
> *Dear all,*
>
> As we know,RIPE NCC and ARIN have the similar 2 years limit for trans
Dear Team,
I also support Mr. Ajay. For M one can't predict. Policy should
accomodate M cases.
Rajesh Panwala
On 12-Sep-2017 10:04 AM, "Ajai Kumar" <joinaj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Policy chair,
> I personally partial support if M& A case be excluded as no one kn
