On behalf of SAGE-AU, I support this proposal.
On 13 Sep 2015 1:24 am, "Masato Yamanishi" wrote:
> Dear colleagues
>
> Version 3 of prop-113: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria,
> reached consensus at the APNIC 40 Open Policy Meeting and later at the
> APNIC Member
Andy1+, and support this proposal . Just keep simple, authenticate and
accountable .
Regards / Jahangir
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Andy Linton wrote:
> I support this proposal.
>
> I support it because it makes it slightly easier for organisations in
> developing
I support this proposal.
I support it because it makes it slightly easier for organisations in
developing regions to get a workable allocation of IPv4 address space which
is provider independent allowing them to change their provider without
renumbering.
But I don't believe it goes far enough.
Dear colleagues
Version 3 of prop-113: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria,
reached consensus at the APNIC 40 Open Policy Meeting and later at the
APNIC Member Meeting (AMM).
This proposal will now move to the next step in the APNIC Policy
Development Process and is being returned to