Hi Satoru,
Thanks for investing time in the several policy proposals.
I think that the last couple of emails could help all you to better understand
the problem.
Clearly, if different people read the current policy text in a different way,
it will be much better to find a way so we have a sing
..@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Owen DeLong
Sent: Saturday, 24 August 2019 12:45 AM
To: Simon Sohel Baroi / Global Business / 01847102243 /
Cc: Sumon Ahmed Sabir ; Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
I think the current text isn’t really
policy text is
good.
Kind regards
Javed Khan
MSCE and CCSP
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Sumon Ahmed Sabir
Sent: Saturday, 10 August 2019 10:33 PM
To: Policy SIG
Subject: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Dear SIG members
A new ver
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-124,based
on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals.
Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons
that the pr
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Monday, 26 August 2019 6:19 PM
To: Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Hi Javed,
I think you’re getting something wrong
...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Owen DeLong
Sent: Saturday, 24 August 2019 12:45 AM
To: Simon Sohel Baroi / Global Business / 01847102243 /
Cc: Sumon Ahmed Sabir ; Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
I think the current text isn’t really a problem
y-boun...@lists.apnic.net
> <mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net>
> <mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net>> on behalf of Sumon Ahmed Sabir
> mailto:sasa...@gmail.com>>
> Sent: Saturday, 10 August 2019 10:33 PM
> To: Policy SIG mailto:sig-pol...@apnic.net&g
] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal "prop-124: Clarification on Sub-Assignments"
has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 48 in
Chiang Mai, Thailand on Thursda
I think the current text isn’t really a problem because reasonable people apply
a reasonable interpretation of intent rather than the literal meaning.
The proposal brings literal meaning more in line with well understood intent.
While I don’t believe there is an actual problem to solve here, I
Dear Sir,
Also, Requesting to the Author to represent the Proposal with Example and
Graphical Representation.
The example should have comparison with Present situation and the Propose
Solution of the problem.
- with regards
SIMON.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 8:33 PM Sumon Ahmed Sabir wrote:
> De
Sabir
Sent: Saturday, 10 August 2019 10:33 PM
To: Policy SIG
Subject: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal "prop-124: Clarification on Sub-Assignments"
has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presen
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal "prop-124: Clarification on Sub-Assignments"
has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 48 in
Chiang Mai, Thailand on Thursday, 12 September 2019.
Information about earlier versions is availa
12 matches
Mail list logo
