Said Chien-Yu Chen on Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 10:50:39PM -0600,
> well, I just tried to re-do the image with -v flag. Here is what I got.
> I'll calculate these number later..
Why don't you just do a direct copy of the CD, instead of the
filesystem. The difference is subtle but significant.
# d
> Are there a whole buttload of small files on the original CD? The
> extensions basically cause it to store more metadata for each file, so
> if so, that could explain it.
>
> If you give mkiosfs the -v flag, it'll give more info, and I believe
> that one of the things it'll give is how many blo
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 07:40:40PM -0600, Paul Sack wrote:
| It could have something to do with the header information in the iso. Or
| something. You are right - that is odd. My mkisofs (version 1.11.3)
| doesn't have the `-J' option. What does it do?
As somebody else mentioned, -J is Joliet.
> It could have something to do with the header information in the iso. Or
> something. You are right - that is odd. My mkisofs (version 1.11.3)
> doesn't have the `-J' option. What does it do?
-J is for Joliet, that windows CD file system. I was thinking that it
might have something to do with
Today at 3:34am, Chien-Yu Chen expounded:
++ Hi!
++
++ I am trying to make a CD, so I do the usual
++
++ mkisofs -J -o /usr/o2k.iso /mnt/cdrom/
++
++ However, after the iso image is made, I mounted it through loop device
++ and do a df. Here is the result
++
++ /dev/cdrom 02
Hi!
I am trying to make a CD, so I do the usual
mkisofs -J -o /usr/o2k.iso /mnt/cdrom/
However, after the iso image is made, I mounted it through loop device
and do a df. Here is the result
/dev/cdrom 0202 0 100% /mnt/cdrom
/usr/w2k.iso609904
