Re: [Siglinux] hide-body/show-body

2003-12-04 Thread William L. Jarrold
Hah, I fooled you all! No just kidding...RTFM...I went back to the book and realized D'oh!, I needed to be in outline mode (via m-x outline-mode) first. Sorry for wasting your time and our electricity. Bill On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, chris wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:09:01PM -0600, William L.

Re: [Siglinux] hide-body/show-body

2003-12-04 Thread chris
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:09:01PM -0600, William L. Jarrold wrote: > I recently started using the wondeful gnu-emacs outline commands > m-x hide-body, m-x show-all. What happened? They aren't working > anymore. I think I last used 'em about 1 week ago. I think I saw a note > about a kernel u

Re: [Siglinux] hide-body/show-body

2003-12-04 Thread Paul Sack
On Dec 4, 2003, at 3:09 PM, William L. Jarrold wrote: p.p.s. by accident I discoverd that there is somethign called m-x hippie-expand. Cool, mhhhn, dude! Anyone know what this is for? I didn't know about it either. Apparently, if you type a few letters in a word, then run hippie-expand, it

[Siglinux] hide-body/show-body

2003-12-04 Thread William L. Jarrold
Dear Unix Studs, I recently started using the wondeful gnu-emacs outline commands m-x hide-body, m-x show-all. What happened? They aren't working anymore. I think I last used 'em about 1 week ago. I think I saw a note about a kernel upgrade to the UT CS machines, and that is what I am using (e