On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 02:24:49PM -0500, Wei-shi Tsai wrote :
| No, I don't need SSH (too slow), I need implicit SSL.
I wouldn't expect ssh to be slower than ssl. ssl is pretty slow/cpu
intensive too, you know :)
`ssh -c blowfish' can greatly speed up ssh, especially on slow
machines.
sftp i
If you have some control over both ends, you might want to look at
safetp (http://safetp.cs.berkeley.edu/). It creates a transparent
tunnel for standard FTP to travel through. The cool part is that you
can set it up so that authentication is done via an encrypted channel,
but still push the data
No, I don't need SSH (too slow), I need implicit SSL.
Daniel Brown wrote:
tried sftp? it comes in the openss(h|l) stuff
it actually connects to sshd on port 22. useful idea
danb
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:55:11PM -0500, Wei-shi Tsai wrote:
Hey everyone,
I need to locate a FTP client that s
tried sftp? it comes in the openss(h|l) stuff
it actually connects to sshd on port 22. useful idea
danb
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:55:11PM -0500, Wei-shi Tsai wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I need to locate a FTP client that supports the use of implicit SSL. It
> obviously need to be for Linux,
Hey everyone,
I need to locate a FTP client that supports the use of implicit SSL. It
obviously need to be for Linux, and I would like something that is
command line driven. I've tried lftp, but the documentation is cryptic
so I can't quite figure out how to use it. Any recommendations?
--
