Yeah I'd love to do that as well. I imagine i'd split that into another show
but film it at the same time, not that theres anything wrong with that.
I did just start watching the techcrunch version as well.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach
Australia
Interesting comments.
Well my defence is this, quoting www.siliconbeach.org:
"This website was created with no plan, just a question: "*how can we bring
the Australian technology community together?*"
We started a mailing list to connect people and get a conversation going,
which has now turned i
I like this idea! I'd totally watch it.
On Feb 2, 3:51 pm, Owen Kelly wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I received a bit of feedback from my introductions post last week about a
> startup show. I have been looking at producing one, so I am pretty keen to
> get it off the ground, but I will need your hel
On 06/02/2011, at 8:33 PM, Geoff Langdale wrote:
11 is an interesting number. Most of us have 10 fingers. ;-)
Indeed. However it's only what I was told during a discussion about
developing for mobile Safari, I haven't verified it... and in any case
it's
possible that the limit is in Safari n
11 points suggests that an approach should be parsimonious with number
of contact points. 3 points per object seems like the maximum.
Is orientation of the objects significant or just position? How many
objects is the target?
Does anyone know if there's a material that is 'invisible' w.r.t the
to
