Re: [SiliconBeach] Re: Patents in a web world

2010-03-29 Thread Roger Kermode
Total agree with this last comment. Good advice early usually costs far less than paying for things to be fixed up later. The number of times I've seen people take shortcuts to achieve false economies is amazing. cheers, Roger On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:03 PM, 1_Place wrote: > Please consid

[SiliconBeach] Re: Patents in a web world

2010-03-27 Thread 1_Place
Please consider the issues raised and, if unclear or want verification, run them passed a patent attorney. In most cases, a patent attorney will answer your questions at no cost so long as it does not tie them up for too long. I am happy to answer specific questions via a telephone call if you ne

Re: [SiliconBeach] Re: Patents in a web world

2010-03-24 Thread Roger Kermode
Hi Everyone, thought I should chip in here... as I've helped a number of companies with their patents in terms of structuring them to get granted, their overall IP strategy, and helping them work more efficiently with Australian and US attorneys. Some thoughts to consider: *1) Patents should be

[SiliconBeach] Re: Patents in a web world

2010-03-24 Thread Tagmotion
Rich, have a look at the discussion thread 'Random thought on IP protection' from last August. Cheers, Andrew. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach Australia mailing list. Guidelines on discussion: http://tr.im/ujKF No lurkers! It is expected that you

[SiliconBeach] Re: Patents in a web world

2010-03-24 Thread Jason Held
Hi Richard, Trademarkyes for logos. Apologies if it was a bit of a stretch. One "trick" is to embed the product design a part of the logo or name, then the trademark covers both. Like I said though, it's not that much protection, and from the sounds of things isn't applicable to you anyways.

Re: [SiliconBeach] Re: Patents in a web world

2010-03-23 Thread Richard Owens
WowI wonder what that does to Twitter! On 23/03/2010, at 11:41 PM, Jeromy Evans wrote: >> Facebook wanting to patent the concept of "social networking"...or probably >> more appropriate to use MySpace as an example. So it's kinda the layout of >> the site and the way it does what it does t

[SiliconBeach] Re: Patents in a web world

2010-03-23 Thread Jeromy Evans
>Facebook wanting to patent the concept of "social networking"...or probably >more appropriate to use MySpace as an example.  So it's kinda the layout of >the site and the way it does what it does that we were looking to protect. Just for fun, here's US patent 7,669,123: "Dynamically providing a

Re: [SiliconBeach] Re: Patents in a web world

2010-03-23 Thread Richard Owens
Your last point is a very good point and I must say, I kinda wanted that $5K for marketing and for further developing the website that can help it generate some income. When I say there's nothing like it yet, I know your concernI mean, I've never seen anything like it, no one else I've spok

[SiliconBeach] Re: Patents in a web world

2010-03-23 Thread Jason Held
Hello Rich, Welcome to the group! You can patent just about anything, but that doesn't necessarily protect you. Example: a very large aerospace company received a patent for *every* wireless transmission in space, to discourage development in wireless subsystems. Completely worthless to them, s