Yes, I did post this on my Live Journal:"Also,it clearly didn't work for 1998 when France won its first world cup (England won in '66). "
But winning two World Cups...that's a good one!
Deepa.
On 6/23/06, Yazad Jal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By this logic Italy should have won two World Cups i
By this logic Italy should have won two World Cups in 1982. (1982 + 1982 =
3964). And wait, France won in 1998. They shouldn't have. 3964-1998 = 1966.
Damn England should have won. And as I'm on the subject, this logic ensures
that only previous winners of the World Cup have any chance of winnin
THE 2006 FIFA WORLD CUP WINNER is ...
Brazil won the world cup in 1994. Before that, the
y had won this title forthe last time in 1970.If you add up: 1970 + 1994 = 3964Argentina won the world cup for the last time in 1986. Before that only
in 1978.And 1978 + 1986 = 3964Germany, though, won the
Eugen Leitl wrote:
If we assume naturally driven people are most productive,
and that many such are caught up in suboptimal configurations
(the usual accursed $dayjob, aka the salt mines) then providing
a baseline financial security would result in increased
productivity. And of the best qualit
i thought it was aramaic. but it depends which lord we are talking about. they
were a diverse bunch.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:14:39PM -0400, Vinit Bhansali wrote:
> Actually, written in Sanskrit.
On 6/22/06, Biju Chacko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[1] For those who are interested, I can definitely recommend Popy
umbrellas over St John's. There -- I've stated my position on Kerala's
version of the Pepsi vs Coke battle.
It was easy in Tamil Nadu. We all went for SE Asian Stag Brand umbrell
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 06:26:13PM +0530, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
> Eugen Leitl wrote: [ on 06:05 PM 6/22/2006 ]
>
> >I'm wondering about the outcome of two alternative realities:
> >one, a libertarian's wet dream, another, a scandinavian model
> >on steroids (baseline citizen salary, financed by m
Eugen Leitl wrote: [ on 06:05 PM 6/22/2006 ]
I'm wondering about the outcome of two alternative realities:
one, a libertarian's wet dream, another, a scandinavian model
on steroids (baseline citizen salary, financed by mostly
noncorporate taxes). I honestly don't know which of both
would win.
I really like SF author Dan Simmons' _The Hollow Man_, and some of
the _Hyperion_ series. At his best, he both disturbs and provokes
(thought, as well as more extreme responses).
The below is clearly intended both as flamebait and as food for thought:
http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message/200
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:30:52AM +0530, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
> My feelings exactly. However, there is that pesky habit of eating
> that I need to take care of first. Working (heh) on it.
I'm wondering about the outcome of two alternative realities:
one, a libertarian's wet dream, another, a
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 03:49:55PM +0530, Amoghavarsha JS wrote:
> http://in.maps.fon.com/ (83 as of now)
Yes, I know what fon.com does. I've also read
the "put your AP at the window" bit. It is
very different from "put your weatherproofed
AP up the pole with a decent aerial" bit.
Which gives you
Has it occurred to anyone that given Microsoft MacBU is transitioning
to Xcode for the Intel version of MacOffice [1][2], this effectively
means Office will henceforth be built on GCC?
How long ago was it when GCC and Office represented ideological
polarity?
[1] http://davidweiss.blogspot
http://in.maps.fon.com/ (83 as of now)
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:30:01PM -0700, Zeenat wrote:
PS. for the mathematicians among us. martin informs us
that spain needs 22,000 foneros for 100% wi-fi
Something is wrong with his mathematics. A typical
AP's coverage area is neg
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:30:01PM -0700, Zeenat wrote:
> PS. for the mathematicians among us. martin informs us
> that spain needs 22,000 foneros for 100% wi-fi
Something is wrong with his mathematics. A typical
AP's coverage area is negligible.
> coverage. whats the figure for india?
--
Euge
Devdas Bhagat wrote: [ on 01:18 PM 6/22/2006 ]
On 22/06/06 06:24 +0530, sastry wrote:
> On Wed June 21 2006 22:18, Radhika, Y. wrote:
> > the lord's book was written originally in Greek!
>
> You mean JRR Tolkien wrote in Greek?
DNA wrote his guide in English.
Ummust...resist...temptation..
On 22/06/06, Biju Chacko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[1] For those who are interested, I can definitely recommend Popy
umbrellas over St John's. There -- I've stated my position on Kerala's
version of the Pepsi vs Coke battle.
Hmm... I was under the impression that this one just a battle in the
On 22/06/06 06:24 +0530, sastry wrote:
> On Wed June 21 2006 22:18, Radhika, Y. wrote:
> > the lord's book was written originally in Greek!
>
> You mean JRR Tolkien wrote in Greek?
DNA wrote his guide in English.
Devdas Bhagat
On 22/06/06, Binand Sethumadhavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/06/06, Biju Chacko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would only be the New Testament. The old testament was written in
> Hebrew (mostly). In addition to stories, there's poetry, songs,
> letters, soft-porn and one of St John's rea
18 matches
Mail list logo
