On 5/16/07, Deepa Mohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nishant wrote:
There is surely a difference between art that shocks and art that
> sensationalises. Art should, per se, shock, inspire, inspire, leading
> you to different paradigms of the sublime. It is about seeking the
> most impossible, the
Abhishek Hazra [16/05/07 09:40 +0530]:
great! wonderful!
obviously Neeraj Jain and his goons have their supporters, as Mr.
Ashok Malik so eloquently demonstrates.
obviuously the article glosses over multiple points: the fact that
this is happening in Narendra Modi's fascist state of Gujrat for
ex
Nishant wrote:
There is surely a difference between art that shocks and art that
sensationalises. Art should, per se, shock, inspire, inspire, leading
you to different paradigms of the sublime. It is about seeking the
most impossible, the improbable, and the disparate.
Nishant...I agree with
Frankly, I'd find this pretty distasteful [1]. This seems to be just
another example of the recent trend of "shock art" like the display of
dead bodies as art:
And here I was, thinking that the only good art it art that shocks
you. There is surely a difference between art that shocks and art tha
Udhay Shankar N wrote [at 06:57 AM 5/16/2007] :
Since marketing costs in the US are an order of
magnitude higher than in India, voilà. So, even
for those US companies which take $100k as a
seed round, they'll need further cash infusions
earlier than an equivalent US company
er. An equivalen
On 5/16/07, shiv sastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnist1.asp?main_variable=Columnist&file_name=ashok%2Fashok77.txt&writer=ashok
Pioneer edit
For Left libertines, it's okay to malign Christ and Durga in 'art'
A large cross depicting Christ with his penis hangi
great! wonderful!
obviously Neeraj Jain and his goons have their supporters, as Mr.
Ashok Malik so eloquently demonstrates.
obviuously the article glosses over multiple points: the fact that
this is happening in Narendra Modi's fascist state of Gujrat for
example.
where a political leader like Ner
http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnist1.asp?main_variable=Columnist&file_name=ashok%2Fashok77.txt&writer=ashok
Pioneer edit
For Left libertines, it's okay to malign Christ and Durga in 'art'
A large cross depicting Christ with his penis hanging out, semen dripping
from it into a commode.
A n
Vinit Bhansali wrote: [ on 06:15 AM 5/16/2007 ]
Well, this has been a very common issue amongst VC's (atleast what I get
from their blogs) about how the barrier to entry is so low that very few
companies require multi-million dollar investment early on.
To my way of thinking, "low entry barrie
> Not exactly true. A startup in Silicon Valley can actually use $5-10
> million in a first round of funding. A startup in India doesn't need
> that kind of money in the first round, especially if we are talking
> about a company whose output is software. The kind of money an
> average Indian
Moreover, when asked to choose, diners prefer the
individual pay to the inefficient split-bill method.
Like many studies of this type, perhaps that should read "when asked to
chose, college sophomores prefer the individual pay to the split-bill
method".
Most diners I know prefer the split-
I've been a seed-level funder for some 8 years now, earlier through
Passionfund and now through (duh) Seedfund.
And there are a few others like me - Pravin Gandhi of Infinity Venture (also
now at Seedfund) is one name that comes to mind - who have concentrated
small bits of money and large chunks
On 5/14/07, Udhay Shankar N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vinit Bhansali wrote: [ on 06:31 AM 5/15/2007 ]
>After all ... Many of the variables are similar .. It's not like different
>issues/services/technologies are being used in different markets. Same GSM,
>same J2ME, same .Net, same AJAX, same e
On 5/15/07, ashok _ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it should probably not be called cinema... but something else.
Re-mix-ima?
Thaths
--
Homer: He has all the money in the world, but there's one thing he can't buy.
Marge: What's that?
Homer: (pause) A dinosaur.
-- Hom
Udhay Shankar N wrote: [ on 04:23 PM 5/15/2007 ]
It's sometimes awkward when the bill arrives at a large gathering of
people at a restaurant - figuring out who pays what, &c. Here's an
interesting study of precisely this problem. I'd be fascinated to
hear comments from Madhu (and others!) on t
i dont think stitching "raw pieces together" can make any kind of
watchable cinema
it should probably not be called cinema... but something else.
On 5/15/07, Venkat Mangudi wrote:
I think the difference is that everyone can be a part of creating the
cinema. As I understand it, they ha
source != actors/scenes
source = footage, edits, tracks.
the real question is, is it watchable? (i.e does it compile) :)
ck
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:06:45AM -0400, Vinit Bhansali wrote:
> Sounds more like long-distance collaborative production mixed with the CC
> license
> (CC=Creative Com
Sounds more like long-distance collaborative production mixed with the CC
license
(CC=Creative Commons).
Still, how can movies be open source?
How do I, as a contributor, go and edit another person's movie and remove
person X from the cast and replace that with a person Y?
- Vinit
> -Origi
Thaths wrote:
On 5/15/07, Venkat Mangudi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://opensourcecinema.org/
How is this different from a liberally CC licensed collection of work?
I think the difference is that everyone can be a part of creating the
cinema. As I understand it, they have requests out the
On 5/15/07, Venkat Mangudi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://opensourcecinema.org/
Will this be destructive or constructive? Going by the open source
revolution, it is surely going to change the way audio-visual art is
being sold/presented to the world.
How is this different from a liberally C
http://opensourcecinema.org/
Will this be destructive or constructive? Going by the open source
revolution, it is surely going to change the way audio-visual art is
being sold/presented to the world.
-Venkat
It's sometimes awkward when the bill arrives at a
large gathering of people at a restaurant -
figuring out who pays what, &c. Here's an
interesting study of precisely this problem. I'd
be fascinated to hear comments from Madhu (and others!) on this.
Udhay
http://www.chicagocdr.org/cdrpubs/pd
22 matches
Mail list logo
