On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:39:31AM +0530, Kiran Jonnalagadda wrote:
Could you elaborate?
I presume camera adds design complexity and price.
They wanted the basic design out of the door first, and maybe
there will be enhanced models after.
The camera is a significant deciding factor in any
On 11 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you elaborate?
I presume camera adds design complexity and price. They wanted the
basic design out of the door first, and maybe there will be enhanced
models after.
I suppose that this was the 'business' reason why the camera wasn't
included,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:14:26PM +0530, Alok G. Singh wrote:
I suppose that this was the 'business' reason why the camera wasn't
included, rather than Harald's unwillingness to have a camera.
You can't see modern cameras. They're the size of a pencil eraser,
and have a pinpick aperture.
http://www.langston.com/Fun_People/1998/1998AWJ.html
Venkat
Binand Sethumadhavan wrote:
Consider this case. A popular actor/chief minister dies. His wife and
his concubine contest his legacy and fight the election. The people
vote the concubine as his heir. By what yardstick do you call this
cultural conservatism?
Is there any mention to the fact
Eugen Leitl wrote:
The better ones are good enough for family-type events and
snapshots. You can't beat the law of optics, but I'm not going
to lug a kg of glass, metal and electronics around, unless I'm
on quest.
Quite agree with you there. But what about small discrete functionally
http://www.unitedmedia.com/creators/othercoast/archive/images/othercoast2052373070703.gif
or http://tinyurl.com/2cd3k8
Bruce
